Demographics details for Ehrhardt, SC vs Clarendon, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ehrhardt, SC vs Clarendon, TX.
| Data | Ehrhardt | Clarendon |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 438 | 1,948 |
| Median Age | 63.5 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $35,923 | $47,457 |
| Married Families | 56.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Ehrhardt vs Clarendon
- The population in Clarendon is higher at 1,948, compared to 438 in Ehrhardt.
- Residents in Ehrhardt have a higher median age of 63.5 years compared to 33.7 years in Clarendon.
- Clarendon has a higher median income of $47,457, compared to $35,923 in Ehrhardt.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ehrhardt at 56.0% compared to 25.0% in Clarendon.
- Ehrhardt has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 10% in Clarendon.
- The unemployment rate in Ehrhardt is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.5% in Clarendon.
Demographics
Demographics Ehrhardt vs Clarendon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ehrhardt | Clarendon |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 50 | 11 |
| White | 50 | 76 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 6 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ehrhardt vs Clarendon
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ehrhardt at 50% compared to 11% in Clarendon.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clarendon at 76% compared to 50% in Ehrhardt.
- In Clarendon, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Ehrhardt.
- Clarendon has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 0% in Ehrhardt.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clarendon at 3%, compared to 0% in Ehrhardt.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ehrhardt and Clarendon at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ehrhardt | Clarendon |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 25.8% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 20.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 18.3% |
| Obesity | 41.6% | 38.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ehrhardt vs Clarendon
- In Clarendon, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.8% in Ehrhardt.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clarendon at 25.8% versus 20.1% in Ehrhardt.
- Clarendon has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 19.3% in Ehrhardt.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clarendon at 18.3% compared to 16.1% in Ehrhardt.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ehrhardt at 41.6% compared to 38.4% in Clarendon.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ehrhardt at 30.0% compared to 8.0% in Clarendon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ehrhardt | Clarendon |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.0% (13) | 0.7% (14) |
| High School Diploma | 26.9% (118) | 11.4% (222) |
| Less than High School | 23.5% (103) | 17.6% (342) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.2% (119) | 7.3% (142) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ehrhardt vs Clarendon
- A higher percentage of residents in Ehrhardt have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.7% in Clarendon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ehrhardt hold a high school diploma at 26.9% compared to 11.4% in Clarendon.
- More residents in Ehrhardt have less than a high school education at 23.5% compared to 17.6% in Clarendon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ehrhardt hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.2% compared to 7.3% in Clarendon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.