Demographics details for Ehrhardt, SC vs Cambridge, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ehrhardt, SC vs Cambridge, MD.
| Data | Ehrhardt | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 438 | 13,129 |
| Median Age | 63.5 years | 37.3 years |
| Median Income | $35,923 | $44,114 |
| Married Families | 56.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Ehrhardt vs Cambridge
- The population in Cambridge is higher at 13,129, compared to 438 in Ehrhardt.
- Residents in Ehrhardt have a higher median age of 63.5 years compared to 37.3 years in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher median income of $44,114, compared to $35,923 in Ehrhardt.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ehrhardt at 56.0% compared to 27.0% in Cambridge.
- Ehrhardt has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 11% in Cambridge.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Ehrhardt and Cambridge at 5.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Ehrhardt vs Cambridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ehrhardt | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 50 | 44 |
| White | 50 | 35 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ehrhardt vs Cambridge
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ehrhardt at 50% compared to 44% in Cambridge.
- Ehrhardt has a higher percentage of White residents at 50% compared to 35% in Cambridge.
- In Cambridge, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Ehrhardt.
- Cambridge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Ehrhardt.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cambridge at 11%, compared to 0% in Ehrhardt.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ehrhardt and Cambridge at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ehrhardt | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 18.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 20.3% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 20.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 12.6% |
| Obesity | 41.6% | 42.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ehrhardt vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 17.8% in Ehrhardt.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cambridge at 20.3% versus 20.1% in Ehrhardt.
- Cambridge has a higher smoking rate at 20.9% compared to 19.3% in Ehrhardt.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ehrhardt at 16.1% compared to 12.6% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has higher obesity rates at 42.2% compared to 41.6% in Ehrhardt.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ehrhardt at 30.0% compared to 18.0% in Cambridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ehrhardt | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.0% (13) | 0.9% (120) |
| High School Diploma | 26.9% (118) | 22.1% (2,903) |
| Less than High School | 23.5% (103) | 11.2% (1,477) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.2% (119) | 13.6% (1,783) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ehrhardt vs Cambridge
- A higher percentage of residents in Ehrhardt have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.9% in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ehrhardt hold a high school diploma at 26.9% compared to 22.1% in Cambridge.
- More residents in Ehrhardt have less than a high school education at 23.5% compared to 11.2% in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ehrhardt hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.2% compared to 13.6% in Cambridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.