Demographics details for Edmore, MI vs Spanish fork, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Edmore, MI vs Spanish fork, UT.
Data | Edmore | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,249 | 44,102 |
Median Age | 42.9 years | 27.4 years |
Median Income | $51,029 | $93,989 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Edmore vs Spanish fork
- The population in Spanish fork is higher at 44,102, compared to 1,249 in Edmore.
- Residents in Edmore have a higher median age of 42.9 years compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989, compared to $51,029 in Edmore.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Edmore at 45.0% compared to 43.0% in Spanish fork.
- Edmore has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Spanish fork.
- The unemployment rate in Edmore is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.8% in Spanish fork.
Demographics
Demographics Edmore vs Spanish fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Edmore | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 90 | 80 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 8 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Edmore vs Spanish fork
- In Spanish fork, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Edmore.
- Edmore has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 80% in Spanish fork.
- Both Edmore and Spanish fork have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Spanish fork has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 8% in Edmore.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Spanish fork at 7%, compared to 2% in Edmore.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Edmore and Spanish fork at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Edmore | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 10.8% |
Depression | 27.9% | 23.8% |
Smoking | 23.5% | 7.7% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 8.3% |
Obesity | 39.2% | 31.0% |
Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Edmore vs Spanish fork
- More residents in Edmore report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 15.0% in Spanish fork.
- Depression is more prevalent in Edmore at 27.9% compared to 23.8% in Spanish fork.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Edmore at 23.5% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
- Binge drinking is more common in Edmore at 17.0% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
- Obesity rates are higher in Edmore at 39.2% compared to 31.0% in Spanish fork.
- Disability percentages are higher in Edmore at 28.0% compared to 8.0% in Spanish fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Edmore | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (11) | 0.4% (175) |
High School Diploma | 34.9% (436) | 9.1% (4,010) |
Less than High School | 25.3% (316) | 5.9% (2,583) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (136) | 19.4% (8,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Edmore vs Spanish fork
- A higher percentage of residents in Edmore have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Spanish fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Edmore hold a high school diploma at 34.9% compared to 9.1% in Spanish fork.
- More residents in Edmore have less than a high school education at 25.3% compared to 5.9% in Spanish fork.
- In Spanish fork, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 10.9% in Edmore.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.