Demographics details for Edmonds, WA vs Pocahontas, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Edmonds, WA vs Pocahontas, AR.
| Data | Edmonds | Pocahontas |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 42,593 | 7,546 |
| Median Age | 45.8 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $110,057 | $38,912 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Edmonds vs Pocahontas
- In Edmonds, the population is higher at 42,593, compared to 7,546 in Pocahontas.
- Residents in Edmonds have a higher median age of 45.8 years compared to 36.5 years in Pocahontas.
- Edmonds has a higher median income of $110,057 compared to $38,912 in Pocahontas.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Edmonds at 49.0% compared to 37.0% in Pocahontas.
- The poverty level is higher in Pocahontas at 19%, compared to 0% in Edmonds.
- The unemployment rate in Edmonds is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.5% in Pocahontas.
Demographics
Demographics Edmonds vs Pocahontas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Edmonds | Pocahontas |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 75 | 90 |
| Asian | 9 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Edmonds vs Pocahontas
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Edmonds at 2% compared to 1% in Pocahontas.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pocahontas at 90% compared to 75% in Edmonds.
- The Asian population is larger in Edmonds at 9% compared to 1% in Pocahontas.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Edmonds at 6% compared to 1% in Pocahontas.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Edmonds at 8% compared to 7% in Pocahontas.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Edmonds and Pocahontas at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Edmonds | Pocahontas |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 22.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 16.6% |
| Depression | 28.1% | 29.9% |
| Smoking | 9.6% | 27.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 31.0% | 43.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Edmonds vs Pocahontas
- In Pocahontas, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.0% compared to 15.3% in Edmonds.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pocahontas at 29.9% versus 28.1% in Edmonds.
- Pocahontas has a higher smoking rate at 27.1% compared to 9.6% in Edmonds.
- Binge drinking is more common in Edmonds at 16.4% compared to 14.1% in Pocahontas.
- Pocahontas has higher obesity rates at 43.5% compared to 31.0% in Edmonds.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pocahontas at 22.0% compared to 12.0% in Edmonds.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Edmonds | Pocahontas |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (232) | 0.5% (40) |
| High School Diploma | 11.0% (4,689) | 19.8% (1,491) |
| Less than High School | 4.1% (1,747) | 15.7% (1,186) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.7% (16,493) | 10.4% (782) |
Education Levels Comparison: Edmonds vs Pocahontas
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Edmonds and Pocahontas at 0.5%.
- In Pocahontas, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.8% compared to 11.0% in Edmonds.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pocahontas at 15.7%, compared to 4.1% in Edmonds.
- A higher percentage of residents in Edmonds hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.7% compared to 10.4% in Pocahontas.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.