Demographics details for Edmonds, WA vs Cedar hill, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Edmonds, WA vs Cedar hill, TX.
| Data | Edmonds | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 42,593 | 48,341 |
| Median Age | 45.8 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $110,057 | $84,132 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Edmonds vs Cedar hill
- The population in Cedar hill is higher at 48,341, compared to 42,593 in Edmonds.
- Residents in Edmonds have a higher median age of 45.8 years compared to 35.3 years in Cedar hill.
- Edmonds has a higher median income of $110,057 compared to $84,132 in Cedar hill.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Edmonds at 49.0% compared to 38.0% in Cedar hill.
- The poverty level is higher in Cedar hill at 9%, compared to 0% in Edmonds.
- Cedar hill has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 4.7% in Edmonds.
Demographics
Demographics Edmonds vs Cedar hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Edmonds | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 51 |
| White | 75 | 11 |
| Asian | 9 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Edmonds vs Cedar hill
- In Cedar hill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 51% compared to 2% in Edmonds.
- Edmonds has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 11% in Cedar hill.
- The Asian population is larger in Edmonds at 9% compared to 2% in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 6% in Edmonds.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cedar hill at 9%, compared to 8% in Edmonds.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Edmonds and Cedar hill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Edmonds | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 16.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 28.1% | 20.5% |
| Smoking | 9.6% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 31.0% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Edmonds vs Cedar hill
- In Cedar hill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 15.3% in Edmonds.
- Depression is more prevalent in Edmonds at 28.1% compared to 20.5% in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has a higher smoking rate at 14.8% compared to 9.6% in Edmonds.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar hill at 17.7% compared to 16.4% in Edmonds.
- Cedar hill has higher obesity rates at 35.9% compared to 31.0% in Edmonds.
- Disability percentages are higher in Edmonds at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Cedar hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Edmonds | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (232) | 1.2% (578) |
| High School Diploma | 11.0% (4,689) | 13.4% (6,465) |
| Less than High School | 4.1% (1,747) | 10.2% (4,909) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.7% (16,493) | 18.4% (8,890) |
Education Levels Comparison: Edmonds vs Cedar hill
- In Cedar hill, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Edmonds.
- In Cedar hill, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.4% compared to 11.0% in Edmonds.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cedar hill at 10.2%, compared to 4.1% in Edmonds.
- A higher percentage of residents in Edmonds hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.7% compared to 18.4% in Cedar hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.