Demographics details for Edmonds, WA vs Broken arrow, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Edmonds, WA vs Broken arrow, OK.

Data Edmonds Broken arrow
Population 42,593 117,911
Median Age 45.8 years 36.8 years
Median Income $110,057 $82,547
Married Families 49.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 3.3

Population Comparison: Edmonds vs Broken arrow

  • The population in Broken arrow is higher at 117,911, compared to 42,593 in Edmonds.
  • Residents in Edmonds have a higher median age of 45.8 years compared to 36.8 years in Broken arrow.
  • Edmonds has a higher median income of $110,057 compared to $82,547 in Broken arrow.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Edmonds at 49.0% compared to 43.0% in Broken arrow.
  • The poverty level is higher in Broken arrow at 10%, compared to 0% in Edmonds.
  • The unemployment rate in Edmonds is higher at 4.7%, compared to 3.3% in Broken arrow.

Demographics

Demographics Edmonds vs Broken arrow provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Edmonds Broken arrow
Black 2 5
White 75 65
Asian 9 4
Hispanic 6 10
Two or More Races 8 11
American Indian Data is updating 5

Demographics Comparison: Edmonds vs Broken arrow

  • In Broken arrow, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 2% in Edmonds.
  • Edmonds has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 65% in Broken arrow.
  • The Asian population is larger in Edmonds at 9% compared to 4% in Broken arrow.
  • Broken arrow has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 6% in Edmonds.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Broken arrow at 11%, compared to 8% in Edmonds.
  • In Broken arrow, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 0% in Edmonds.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Edmonds Broken arrow
Mental Health Not Good 15.3% 16.8%
Physical Health Not Good 9.2% 10.3%
Depression 28.1% 25.0%
Smoking 9.6% 14.9%
Binge Drinking 16.4% 15.0%
Obesity 31.0% 34.6%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Edmonds vs Broken arrow

  • In Broken arrow, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 15.3% in Edmonds.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Edmonds at 28.1% compared to 25.0% in Broken arrow.
  • Broken arrow has a higher smoking rate at 14.9% compared to 9.6% in Edmonds.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Edmonds at 16.4% compared to 15.0% in Broken arrow.
  • Broken arrow has higher obesity rates at 34.6% compared to 31.0% in Edmonds.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Edmonds at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Broken arrow.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Edmonds Broken arrow
No Schooling 0.5% (232) 0.8% (935)
High School Diploma 11.0% (4,689) 13.2% (15,535)
Less than High School 4.1% (1,747) 6.6% (7,783)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 38.7% (16,493) 22.2% (26,196)

Education Levels Comparison: Edmonds vs Broken arrow

  • In Broken arrow, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Edmonds.
  • In Broken arrow, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.2% compared to 11.0% in Edmonds.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Broken arrow at 6.6%, compared to 4.1% in Edmonds.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Edmonds hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.7% compared to 22.2% in Broken arrow.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.