Demographics details for Edinburgh, IN vs Gresham, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Edinburgh, IN vs Gresham, OR.
| Data | Edinburgh | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,400 | 111,621 |
| Median Age | 40.1 years | 37.3 years |
| Median Income | $51,496 | $69,437 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Edinburgh vs Gresham
- The population in Gresham is higher at 111,621, compared to 4,400 in Edinburgh.
- Residents in Edinburgh have a higher median age of 40.1 years compared to 37.3 years in Gresham.
- Gresham has a higher median income of $69,437, compared to $51,496 in Edinburgh.
- In Gresham, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 35.0% in Edinburgh.
- The poverty level is higher in Gresham at 13%, compared to 10% in Edinburgh.
- Gresham has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.5% in Edinburgh.
Demographics
Demographics Edinburgh vs Gresham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Edinburgh | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 99 | 55 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 22 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Edinburgh vs Gresham
- In Gresham, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Edinburgh.
- Edinburgh has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 55% in Gresham.
- In Gresham, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Edinburgh.
- Gresham has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 0% in Edinburgh.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gresham at 13%, compared to 1% in Edinburgh.
- In Gresham, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Edinburgh.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Edinburgh | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.9% | 20.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 30.2% | 28.4% |
| Smoking | 25.0% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 20.2% |
| Obesity | 45.0% | 28.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Edinburgh vs Gresham
- In Gresham, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 19.9% in Edinburgh.
- Depression is more prevalent in Edinburgh at 30.2% compared to 28.4% in Gresham.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Edinburgh at 25.0% compared to 17.6% in Gresham.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gresham at 20.2% compared to 16.0% in Edinburgh.
- Obesity rates are higher in Edinburgh at 45.0% compared to 28.6% in Gresham.
- Disability percentages are higher in Edinburgh at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Gresham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Edinburgh | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (77) | 1.6% (1,757) |
| High School Diploma | 22.0% (969) | 15.0% (16,776) |
| Less than High School | 17.1% (751) | 16.5% (18,399) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.5% (286) | 16.2% (18,082) |
Education Levels Comparison: Edinburgh vs Gresham
- A higher percentage of residents in Edinburgh have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.6% in Gresham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Edinburgh hold a high school diploma at 22.0% compared to 15.0% in Gresham.
- More residents in Edinburgh have less than a high school education at 17.1% compared to 16.5% in Gresham.
- In Gresham, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 6.5% in Edinburgh.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.