Demographics details for Edgewater, FL vs Clifton hill, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Edgewater, FL vs Clifton hill, MO.

Data Edgewater Clifton hill
Population 23,506 87
Median Age 54.7 years 28.3 years
Median Income $56,886 $45,500
Married Families 40.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 10% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Edgewater vs Clifton hill

  • In Edgewater, the population is higher at 23,506, compared to 87 in Clifton hill.
  • Residents in Edgewater have a higher median age of 54.7 years compared to 28.3 years in Clifton hill.
  • Edgewater has a higher median income of $56,886 compared to $45,500 in Clifton hill.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Edgewater at 40.0% compared to 31.0% in Clifton hill.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Edgewater and Clifton hill at 10%.
  • Clifton hill has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Edgewater.

Demographics

Demographics Edgewater vs Clifton hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Edgewater Clifton hill
Black 2 Data is updating
White 87 94
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 6 Data is updating
Two or More Races 4 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Edgewater vs Clifton hill

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Edgewater at 2% compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Clifton hill at 94% compared to 87% in Edgewater.
  • The Asian population is larger in Edgewater at 1% compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Edgewater at 6% compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clifton hill at 6%, compared to 4% in Edgewater.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Edgewater and Clifton hill at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Edgewater Clifton hill
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 17.9%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% 14.3%
Depression 22.6% 25.9%
Smoking 23.5% 21.4%
Binge Drinking 18.8% 16.0%
Obesity 32.9% 41.6%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 6.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Edgewater vs Clifton hill

  • In Clifton hill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.6% in Edgewater.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Clifton hill at 25.9% versus 22.6% in Edgewater.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Edgewater at 23.5% compared to 21.4% in Clifton hill.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Edgewater at 18.8% compared to 16.0% in Clifton hill.
  • Clifton hill has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 32.9% in Edgewater.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Edgewater at 18.0% compared to 6.0% in Clifton hill.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Edgewater Clifton hill
No Schooling 0.3% (61) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 21.5% (5,056) 26.4% (23)
Less than High School 11.0% (2,583) 13.8% (12)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.4% (3,859) 3.4% (3)

Education Levels Comparison: Edgewater vs Clifton hill

  • A higher percentage of residents in Edgewater have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Clifton hill.
  • In Clifton hill, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.4% compared to 21.5% in Edgewater.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clifton hill at 13.8%, compared to 11.0% in Edgewater.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Edgewater hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 3.4% in Clifton hill.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.