Demographics details for Edgerton, WI vs Fishing creek, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Edgerton, WI vs Fishing creek, MD.

Data Edgerton Fishing creek
Population 5,934 235
Median Age 36.0 years 55.9 years
Median Income $80,255 $76,250
Married Families 36.0% 58.0%
Poverty Level 5% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Edgerton vs Fishing creek

  • In Edgerton, the population is higher at 5,934, compared to 235 in Fishing creek.
  • The median age in Fishing creek is higher at 55.9 years, compared to 36.0 years in Edgerton.
  • Edgerton has a higher median income of $80,255 compared to $76,250 in Fishing creek.
  • In Fishing creek, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 36.0% in Edgerton.
  • Edgerton has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • Fishing creek has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Edgerton.

Demographics

Demographics Edgerton vs Fishing creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Edgerton Fishing creek
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 82 100
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 11 Data is updating
Two or More Races 5 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Edgerton vs Fishing creek

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Edgerton and Fishing creek at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Fishing creek at 100% compared to 82% in Edgerton.
  • The Asian population is larger in Edgerton at 2% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Edgerton at 11% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Edgerton at 5% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Edgerton and Fishing creek at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Edgerton Fishing creek
Mental Health Not Good 14.9% 15.3%
Physical Health Not Good 10.4% 9.6%
Depression 25.4% 21.2%
Smoking 16.6% 15.1%
Binge Drinking 23.4% 16.8%
Obesity 34.2% 33.1%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 28.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Edgerton vs Fishing creek

  • In Fishing creek, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 14.9% in Edgerton.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Edgerton at 25.4% compared to 21.2% in Fishing creek.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Edgerton at 16.6% compared to 15.1% in Fishing creek.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Edgerton at 23.4% compared to 16.8% in Fishing creek.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Edgerton at 34.2% compared to 33.1% in Fishing creek.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fishing creek at 28.0% compared to 15.0% in Edgerton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Edgerton Fishing creek
No Schooling 1.2% (70) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 14.2% (845) 34.5% (81)
Less than High School 12.8% (758) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.2% (1,079) 16.2% (38)

Education Levels Comparison: Edgerton vs Fishing creek

  • A higher percentage of residents in Edgerton have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Fishing creek.
  • In Fishing creek, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 34.5% compared to 14.2% in Edgerton.
  • More residents in Edgerton have less than a high school education at 12.8% compared to 0.0% in Fishing creek.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Edgerton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.2% compared to 16.2% in Fishing creek.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.