Demographics details for Edgefield, SC vs Onalaska, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Edgefield, SC vs Onalaska, TX.
| Data | Edgefield | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,932 | 3,205 |
| Median Age | 42.9 years | 45.2 years |
| Median Income | $60,033 | $56,168 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Edgefield vs Onalaska
- In Edgefield, the population is higher at 26,932, compared to 3,205 in Onalaska.
- The median age in Onalaska is higher at 45.2 years, compared to 42.9 years in Edgefield.
- Edgefield has a higher median income of $60,033 compared to $56,168 in Onalaska.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Edgefield at 38.0% compared to 35.0% in Onalaska.
- Edgefield has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Onalaska.
- The unemployment rate in Edgefield is higher at 4.9%, compared to 4.5% in Onalaska.
Demographics
Demographics Edgefield vs Onalaska provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Edgefield | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 32 | 1 |
| White | 56 | 91 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Edgefield vs Onalaska
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Edgefield at 32% compared to 1% in Onalaska.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Onalaska at 91% compared to 56% in Edgefield.
- Both Edgefield and Onalaska have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Edgefield at 7% compared to 3% in Onalaska.
- Both Edgefield and Onalaska have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Edgefield and Onalaska at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Edgefield | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 20.3% | 26.0% |
| Smoking | 20.3% | 20.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Edgefield vs Onalaska
- In Onalaska, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.1% in Edgefield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Onalaska at 26.0% versus 20.3% in Edgefield.
- Onalaska has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 20.3% in Edgefield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Onalaska at 19.4% compared to 16.5% in Edgefield.
- Onalaska has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 36.7% in Edgefield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Onalaska at 24.0% compared to 14.0% in Edgefield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Edgefield | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (199) | 0.7% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 19.2% (5,180) | 15.3% (491) |
| Less than High School | 18.3% (4,938) | 21.5% (689) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.1% (3,798) | 5.0% (161) |
Education Levels Comparison: Edgefield vs Onalaska
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Edgefield and Onalaska at 0.7%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Edgefield hold a high school diploma at 19.2% compared to 15.3% in Onalaska.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Onalaska at 21.5%, compared to 18.3% in Edgefield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Edgefield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.1% compared to 5.0% in Onalaska.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.