Demographics details for Edgefield, SC vs Cedar hill, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Edgefield, SC vs Cedar hill, TX.
Data | Edgefield | Cedar hill |
---|---|---|
Population | 26,932 | 48,341 |
Median Age | 42.9 years | 35.3 years |
Median Income | $60,033 | $84,132 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Edgefield vs Cedar hill
- The population in Cedar hill is higher at 48,341, compared to 26,932 in Edgefield.
- Residents in Edgefield have a higher median age of 42.9 years compared to 35.3 years in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has a higher median income of $84,132, compared to $60,033 in Edgefield.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Edgefield and Cedar hill at 38.0%.
- Edgefield has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Cedar hill.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Edgefield and Cedar hill at 4.9%.
Demographics
Demographics Edgefield vs Cedar hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Edgefield | Cedar hill |
---|---|---|
Black | 32 | 51 |
White | 56 | 11 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 7 | 27 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Edgefield vs Cedar hill
- In Cedar hill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 51% compared to 32% in Edgefield.
- Edgefield has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 11% in Cedar hill.
- In Cedar hill, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Edgefield.
- Cedar hill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 7% in Edgefield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cedar hill at 9%, compared to 5% in Edgefield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Edgefield and Cedar hill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Edgefield | Cedar hill |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 16.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 10.4% |
Depression | 20.3% | 20.5% |
Smoking | 20.3% | 14.8% |
Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 36.7% | 35.9% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Edgefield vs Cedar hill
- More residents in Edgefield report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 16.1% in Cedar hill.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar hill at 20.5% versus 20.3% in Edgefield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Edgefield at 20.3% compared to 14.8% in Cedar hill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar hill at 17.7% compared to 16.5% in Edgefield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Edgefield at 36.7% compared to 35.9% in Cedar hill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Edgefield at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Cedar hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Edgefield | Cedar hill |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (199) | 1.2% (578) |
High School Diploma | 19.2% (5,180) | 13.4% (6,465) |
Less than High School | 18.3% (4,938) | 10.2% (4,909) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.1% (3,798) | 18.4% (8,890) |
Education Levels Comparison: Edgefield vs Cedar hill
- In Cedar hill, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.7% in Edgefield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Edgefield hold a high school diploma at 19.2% compared to 13.4% in Cedar hill.
- More residents in Edgefield have less than a high school education at 18.3% compared to 10.2% in Cedar hill.
- In Cedar hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 14.1% in Edgefield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.