Demographics details for Edgefield, SC vs Broken arrow, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Edgefield, SC vs Broken arrow, OK.
Data | Edgefield | Broken arrow |
---|---|---|
Population | 26,932 | 117,911 |
Median Age | 42.9 years | 36.8 years |
Median Income | $60,033 | $82,547 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Edgefield vs Broken arrow
- The population in Broken arrow is higher at 117,911, compared to 26,932 in Edgefield.
- Residents in Edgefield have a higher median age of 42.9 years compared to 36.8 years in Broken arrow.
- Broken arrow has a higher median income of $82,547, compared to $60,033 in Edgefield.
- In Broken arrow, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 38.0% in Edgefield.
- Edgefield has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Broken arrow.
- The unemployment rate in Edgefield is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.3% in Broken arrow.
Demographics
Demographics Edgefield vs Broken arrow provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Edgefield | Broken arrow |
---|---|---|
Black | 32 | 5 |
White | 56 | 65 |
Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
Hispanic | 7 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Edgefield vs Broken arrow
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Edgefield at 32% compared to 5% in Broken arrow.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Broken arrow at 65% compared to 56% in Edgefield.
- In Broken arrow, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Edgefield.
- Broken arrow has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 7% in Edgefield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Broken arrow at 11%, compared to 5% in Edgefield.
- In Broken arrow, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 0% in Edgefield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Edgefield | Broken arrow |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 16.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 10.3% |
Depression | 20.3% | 25.0% |
Smoking | 20.3% | 14.9% |
Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 15.0% |
Obesity | 36.7% | 34.6% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Edgefield vs Broken arrow
- More residents in Edgefield report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 16.8% in Broken arrow.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Broken arrow at 25.0% versus 20.3% in Edgefield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Edgefield at 20.3% compared to 14.9% in Broken arrow.
- Binge drinking is more common in Edgefield at 16.5% compared to 15.0% in Broken arrow.
- Obesity rates are higher in Edgefield at 36.7% compared to 34.6% in Broken arrow.
- Disability percentages are higher in Edgefield at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Broken arrow.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Edgefield | Broken arrow |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (199) | 0.8% (935) |
High School Diploma | 19.2% (5,180) | 13.2% (15,535) |
Less than High School | 18.3% (4,938) | 6.6% (7,783) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.1% (3,798) | 22.2% (26,196) |
Education Levels Comparison: Edgefield vs Broken arrow
- In Broken arrow, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in Edgefield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Edgefield hold a high school diploma at 19.2% compared to 13.2% in Broken arrow.
- More residents in Edgefield have less than a high school education at 18.3% compared to 6.6% in Broken arrow.
- In Broken arrow, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.2% compared to 14.1% in Edgefield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.