Demographics details for Ecru, MS vs Sylvania, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ecru, MS vs Sylvania, GA.
| Data | Ecru | Sylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 919 | 2,602 |
| Median Age | 24.8 years | 43.7 years |
| Median Income | $52,350 | $36,682 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Ecru vs Sylvania
- The population in Sylvania is higher at 2,602, compared to 919 in Ecru.
- The median age in Sylvania is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 24.8 years in Ecru.
- Ecru has a higher median income of $52,350 compared to $36,682 in Sylvania.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ecru at 49.0% compared to 33.0% in Sylvania.
- The poverty level is higher in Sylvania at 18%, compared to 16% in Ecru.
- Sylvania has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 5.0% in Ecru.
Demographics
Demographics Ecru vs Sylvania provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ecru | Sylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 44 | 57 |
| White | 25 | 40 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 23 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ecru vs Sylvania
- In Sylvania, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 57% compared to 44% in Ecru.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sylvania at 40% compared to 25% in Ecru.
- Both Ecru and Sylvania have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ecru at 23% compared to 1% in Sylvania.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ecru at 8% compared to 2% in Sylvania.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ecru and Sylvania at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ecru | Sylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.2% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 25.1% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 25.0% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 40.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ecru vs Sylvania
- More residents in Ecru report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.9% in Sylvania.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ecru at 25.1% compared to 21.8% in Sylvania.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ecru at 25.0% compared to 21.8% in Sylvania.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ecru at 14.6% compared to 13.6% in Sylvania.
- Sylvania has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 39.5% in Ecru.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ecru at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Sylvania.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ecru | Sylvania |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (20) | 0.3% (8) |
| High School Diploma | 15.5% (142) | 27.1% (704) |
| Less than High School | 31.1% (286) | 18.6% (485) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (136) | 10.4% (271) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ecru vs Sylvania
- A higher percentage of residents in Ecru have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.3% in Sylvania.
- In Sylvania, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.1% compared to 15.5% in Ecru.
- More residents in Ecru have less than a high school education at 31.1% compared to 18.6% in Sylvania.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ecru hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 10.4% in Sylvania.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.