Demographics details for Ecru, MS vs Santa ana, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ecru, MS vs Santa ana, CA.
| Data | Ecru | Santa ana |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 919 | 308,189 |
| Median Age | 24.8 years | 33.4 years |
| Median Income | $52,350 | $84,210 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Ecru vs Santa ana
- The population in Santa ana is higher at 308,189, compared to 919 in Ecru.
- The median age in Santa ana is higher at 33.4 years, compared to 24.8 years in Ecru.
- Santa ana has a higher median income of $84,210, compared to $52,350 in Ecru.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ecru at 49.0% compared to 35.0% in Santa ana.
- Ecru has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 14% in Santa ana.
- The unemployment rate in Ecru is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.1% in Santa ana.
Demographics
Demographics Ecru vs Santa ana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ecru | Santa ana |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 44 | 1 |
| White | 25 | -5 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 12 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 78 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Ecru vs Santa ana
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ecru at 44% compared to 1% in Santa ana.
- Ecru has a higher percentage of White residents at 25% compared to -5% in Santa ana.
- In Santa ana, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 0% in Ecru.
- Santa ana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 78%, compared to 23% in Ecru.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Santa ana at 13%, compared to 8% in Ecru.
- In Santa ana, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Ecru.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ecru | Santa ana |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.2% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 25.1% | 17.2% |
| Smoking | 25.0% | 13.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 31.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ecru vs Santa ana
- More residents in Ecru report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.4% in Santa ana.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ecru at 25.1% compared to 17.2% in Santa ana.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ecru at 25.0% compared to 13.4% in Santa ana.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Ecru and Santa ana at 14.6%.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ecru at 39.5% compared to 31.6% in Santa ana.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ecru at 18.0% compared to 8.0% in Santa ana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ecru | Santa ana |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (20) | 5.1% (15,819) |
| High School Diploma | 15.5% (142) | 14.7% (45,332) |
| Less than High School | 31.1% (286) | 42.9% (132,303) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (136) | 11.6% (35,860) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ecru vs Santa ana
- In Santa ana, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.1% compared to 2.2% in Ecru.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ecru hold a high school diploma at 15.5% compared to 14.7% in Santa ana.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Santa ana at 42.9%, compared to 31.1% in Ecru.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ecru hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 11.6% in Santa ana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.