Demographics details for Ecru, MS vs Bonita springs, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ecru, MS vs Bonita springs, FL.
| Data | Ecru | Bonita springs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 919 | 56,370 |
| Median Age | 24.8 years | 60.2 years |
| Median Income | $52,350 | $84,668 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Ecru vs Bonita springs
- The population in Bonita springs is higher at 56,370, compared to 919 in Ecru.
- The median age in Bonita springs is higher at 60.2 years, compared to 24.8 years in Ecru.
- Bonita springs has a higher median income of $84,668, compared to $52,350 in Ecru.
- In Bonita springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 49.0% in Ecru.
- Ecru has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 8% in Bonita springs.
- The unemployment rate in Ecru is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.1% in Bonita springs.
Demographics
Demographics Ecru vs Bonita springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ecru | Bonita springs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 44 | 2 |
| White | 25 | 68 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 21 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ecru vs Bonita springs
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ecru at 44% compared to 2% in Bonita springs.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bonita springs at 68% compared to 25% in Ecru.
- In Bonita springs, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Ecru.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ecru at 23% compared to 21% in Bonita springs.
- Both Ecru and Bonita springs have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 8%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ecru and Bonita springs at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ecru | Bonita springs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.2% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 25.1% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 25.0% | 16.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 18.1% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 26.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ecru vs Bonita springs
- More residents in Ecru report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 14.4% in Bonita springs.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ecru at 25.1% compared to 17.7% in Bonita springs.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ecru at 25.0% compared to 16.1% in Bonita springs.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bonita springs at 18.1% compared to 14.6% in Ecru.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ecru at 39.5% compared to 26.1% in Bonita springs.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ecru at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Bonita springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ecru | Bonita springs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (20) | 1.4% (810) |
| High School Diploma | 15.5% (142) | 14.9% (8,384) |
| Less than High School | 31.1% (286) | 15.7% (8,845) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (136) | 33.1% (18,684) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ecru vs Bonita springs
- A higher percentage of residents in Ecru have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 1.4% in Bonita springs.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ecru hold a high school diploma at 15.5% compared to 14.9% in Bonita springs.
- More residents in Ecru have less than a high school education at 31.1% compared to 15.7% in Bonita springs.
- In Bonita springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.1% compared to 14.8% in Ecru.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.