Demographics details for Eau galle, WI vs Chesapeake, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Eau galle, WI vs Chesapeake, VA.

Data Eau galle Chesapeake
Population 1,224 252,488
Median Age 38.0 years 37.4 years
Median Income $60,000 $92,703
Married Families 320.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 5% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.0

Population Comparison: Eau galle vs Chesapeake

  • The population in Chesapeake is higher at 252,488, compared to 1,224 in Eau galle.
  • Residents in Eau galle have a higher median age of 38.0 years compared to 37.4 years in Chesapeake.
  • Chesapeake has a higher median income of $92,703, compared to $60,000 in Eau galle.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Eau galle at 320.0% compared to 43.0% in Chesapeake.
  • The poverty level is higher in Chesapeake at 8%, compared to 5% in Eau galle.
  • The unemployment rate in Eau galle is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.0% in Chesapeake.

Demographics

Demographics Eau galle vs Chesapeake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Eau galle Chesapeake
Black Data is updating 29
White 100 53
Asian Data is updating 4
Hispanic Data is updating 7
Two or More Races Data is updating 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Eau galle vs Chesapeake

  • In Chesapeake, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 0% in Eau galle.
  • Eau galle has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 53% in Chesapeake.
  • In Chesapeake, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Eau galle.
  • Chesapeake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 0% in Eau galle.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chesapeake at 7%, compared to 0% in Eau galle.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Eau galle and Chesapeake at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Eau galle Chesapeake
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.9%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 10.0%
Depression Data is updating% 20.9%
Smoking Data is updating% 14.8%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 16.1%
Obesity Data is updating% 36.1%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Eau galle vs Chesapeake

  • In Chesapeake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 0.0% in Eau galle.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Chesapeake at 20.9% versus 0.0% in Eau galle.
  • Chesapeake has a higher smoking rate at 14.8% compared to 0.0% in Eau galle.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Chesapeake at 16.1% compared to 0.0% in Eau galle.
  • Chesapeake has higher obesity rates at 36.1% compared to 0.0% in Eau galle.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chesapeake at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Eau galle.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Eau galle Chesapeake
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.8% (2,039)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 13.1% (33,024)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 7.0% (17,684)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 23.8% (60,160)

Education Levels Comparison: Eau galle vs Chesapeake

  • In Chesapeake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Eau galle.
  • In Chesapeake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.1% compared to 0.0% in Eau galle.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chesapeake at 7.0%, compared to 0.0% in Eau galle.
  • In Chesapeake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 0.0% in Eau galle.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.