Demographics details for Eatonton, GA vs Washington, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Eatonton, GA vs Washington, IN.
| Data | Eatonton | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,545 | 12,171 |
| Median Age | 41.1 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $53,870 | $48,255 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Eatonton vs Washington
- The population in Washington is higher at 12,171, compared to 6,545 in Eatonton.
- Residents in Eatonton have a higher median age of 41.1 years compared to 37.0 years in Washington.
- Eatonton has a higher median income of $53,870 compared to $48,255 in Washington.
- In Washington, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 37.0% in Eatonton.
- Eatonton has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 12% in Washington.
- The unemployment rate in Eatonton is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.2% in Washington.
Demographics
Demographics Eatonton vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Eatonton | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 56 | 4 |
| White | 44 | 76 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 12 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Eatonton vs Washington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Eatonton at 56% compared to 4% in Washington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Washington at 76% compared to 44% in Eatonton.
- Both Eatonton and Washington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Washington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 0% in Eatonton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Washington at 8%, compared to 0% in Eatonton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Eatonton and Washington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Eatonton | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 20.6% | 27.6% |
| Smoking | 22.9% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.8% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 43.6% | 36.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Eatonton vs Washington
- More residents in Eatonton report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 18.7% in Washington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Washington at 27.6% versus 20.6% in Eatonton.
- Washington has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 22.9% in Eatonton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Washington at 16.3% compared to 12.8% in Eatonton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Eatonton at 43.6% compared to 36.4% in Washington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Eatonton at 22.0% compared to 16.0% in Washington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Eatonton | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (10) | 1.3% (163) |
| High School Diploma | 27.1% (1,772) | 22.8% (2,771) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (402) | 20.2% (2,460) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.7% (895) | 9.3% (1,129) |
Education Levels Comparison: Eatonton vs Washington
- In Washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.2% in Eatonton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Eatonton hold a high school diploma at 27.1% compared to 22.8% in Washington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Washington at 20.2%, compared to 6.1% in Eatonton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Eatonton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.7% compared to 9.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.