Demographics details for Eatonton, GA vs Underwood, ND
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Eatonton, GA vs Underwood, ND.
| Data | Eatonton | Underwood |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,545 | 780 |
| Median Age | 41.1 years | 47.3 years |
| Median Income | $53,870 | $72,917 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Eatonton vs Underwood
- In Eatonton, the population is higher at 6,545, compared to 780 in Underwood.
- The median age in Underwood is higher at 47.3 years, compared to 41.1 years in Eatonton.
- Underwood has a higher median income of $72,917, compared to $53,870 in Eatonton.
- In Underwood, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 37.0% in Eatonton.
- Eatonton has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 0% in Underwood.
- The unemployment rate in Eatonton is higher at 3.9%, compared to 2.5% in Underwood.
Demographics
Demographics Eatonton vs Underwood provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Eatonton | Underwood |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 56 | 1 |
| White | 44 | 87 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 1 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Eatonton vs Underwood
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Eatonton at 56% compared to 1% in Underwood.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Underwood at 87% compared to 44% in Eatonton.
- In Underwood, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Eatonton.
- Underwood has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Eatonton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Underwood at 6%, compared to 0% in Eatonton.
- In Underwood, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Eatonton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Eatonton | Underwood |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 12.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 20.6% | 17.5% |
| Smoking | 22.9% | 16.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.8% | 22.7% |
| Obesity | 43.6% | 40.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Eatonton vs Underwood
- More residents in Eatonton report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 12.8% in Underwood.
- Depression is more prevalent in Eatonton at 20.6% compared to 17.5% in Underwood.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Eatonton at 22.9% compared to 16.1% in Underwood.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Underwood at 22.7% compared to 12.8% in Eatonton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Eatonton at 43.6% compared to 40.0% in Underwood.
- Disability percentages are higher in Eatonton at 22.0% compared to 10.0% in Underwood.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Eatonton | Underwood |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (10) | 0.1% (1) |
| High School Diploma | 27.1% (1,772) | 19.1% (149) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (402) | 8.6% (67) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.7% (895) | 13.1% (102) |
Education Levels Comparison: Eatonton vs Underwood
- A higher percentage of residents in Eatonton have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.1% in Underwood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Eatonton hold a high school diploma at 27.1% compared to 19.1% in Underwood.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Underwood at 8.6%, compared to 6.1% in Eatonton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Eatonton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.7% compared to 13.1% in Underwood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.