Demographics details for East orange, NJ vs Mc graw, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in East orange, NJ vs Mc graw, NY.
| Data | East orange | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 68,446 | 994 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 32.0 years |
| Median Income | $58,659 | $60,781 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 8.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: East orange vs Mc graw
- In East orange, the population is higher at 68,446, compared to 994 in Mc graw.
- Residents in East orange have a higher median age of 35.1 years compared to 32.0 years in Mc graw.
- Mc graw has a higher median income of $60,781, compared to $58,659 in East orange.
- In Mc graw, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 23.0% in East orange.
- East orange has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 7% in Mc graw.
- The unemployment rate in East orange is higher at 8.2%, compared to 3.5% in Mc graw.
Demographics
Demographics East orange vs Mc graw provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | East orange | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 81 | Data is updating |
| White | -1 | 88 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: East orange vs Mc graw
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in East orange at 81% compared to 0% in Mc graw.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mc graw at 88% compared to -1% in East orange.
- The Asian population is larger in East orange at 2% compared to 0% in Mc graw.
- The Hispanic community is larger in East orange at 12% compared to 4% in Mc graw.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mc graw at 8%, compared to 6% in East orange.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both East orange and Mc graw at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | East orange | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 16.5% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.3% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 39.1% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: East orange vs Mc graw
- More residents in East orange report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 16.2% in Mc graw.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mc graw at 25.5% versus 16.5% in East orange.
- Mc graw has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 17.3% in East orange.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mc graw at 19.1% compared to 13.3% in East orange.
- Obesity rates are higher in East orange at 39.1% compared to 37.3% in Mc graw.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mc graw at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in East orange.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | East orange | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (1,070) | 0.3% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 21.0% (14,369) | 27.1% (269) |
| Less than High School | 11.7% (8,024) | 15.1% (150) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (10,108) | 8.8% (87) |
Education Levels Comparison: East orange vs Mc graw
- A higher percentage of residents in East orange have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.3% in Mc graw.
- In Mc graw, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.1% compared to 21.0% in East orange.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mc graw at 15.1%, compared to 11.7% in East orange.
- A higher percentage of residents in East orange hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 8.8% in Mc graw.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.