Demographics details for East lansing, MI vs South gate, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in East lansing, MI vs South gate, CA.

Data East lansing South gate
Population 47,340 90,926
Median Age 21.4 years 33.7 years
Median Income $44,094 $67,188
Married Families 18.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 19% 18%
Unemployment Rate 3.7 6.1

Population Comparison: East lansing vs South gate

  • The population in South gate is higher at 90,926, compared to 47,340 in East lansing.
  • The median age in South gate is higher at 33.7 years, compared to 21.4 years in East lansing.
  • South gate has a higher median income of $67,188, compared to $44,094 in East lansing.
  • In South gate, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 18.0% in East lansing.
  • East lansing has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 18% in South gate.
  • South gate has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 3.7% in East lansing.

Demographics

Demographics East lansing vs South gate provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic East lansing South gate
Black 7 1
White 73 -21
Asian 9 1
Hispanic 5 97
Two or More Races 6 21
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: East lansing vs South gate

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in East lansing at 7% compared to 1% in South gate.
  • East lansing has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to -21% in South gate.
  • The Asian population is larger in East lansing at 9% compared to 1% in South gate.
  • South gate has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 97%, compared to 5% in East lansing.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South gate at 21%, compared to 6% in East lansing.
  • In South gate, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in East lansing.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric East lansing South gate
Mental Health Not Good 17.5% 16.8%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 14.9%
Depression 25.7% 16.3%
Smoking 15.2% 12.7%
Binge Drinking 16.0% 14.5%
Obesity 36.3% 34.1%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: East lansing vs South gate

  • More residents in East lansing report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 16.8% in South gate.
  • Depression is more prevalent in East lansing at 25.7% compared to 16.3% in South gate.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in East lansing at 15.2% compared to 12.7% in South gate.
  • Binge drinking is more common in East lansing at 16.0% compared to 14.5% in South gate.
  • Obesity rates are higher in East lansing at 36.3% compared to 34.1% in South gate.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both East lansing and South gate at 9.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level East lansing South gate
No Schooling 0.1% (26) 4.6% (4,160)
High School Diploma 3.3% (1,539) 14.9% (13,536)
Less than High School 0.9% (428) 53.3% (48,481)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.1% (9,975) 7.5% (6,822)

Education Levels Comparison: East lansing vs South gate

  • In South gate, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.6% compared to 0.1% in East lansing.
  • In South gate, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.9% compared to 3.3% in East lansing.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South gate at 53.3%, compared to 0.9% in East lansing.
  • A higher percentage of residents in East lansing hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.1% compared to 7.5% in South gate.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.