Demographics details for East lansing, MI vs Little falls, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in East lansing, MI vs Little falls, MN.

Data East lansing Little falls
Population 47,340 9,094
Median Age 21.4 years 40.8 years
Median Income $44,094 $44,455
Married Families 18.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 19% 11%
Unemployment Rate 3.7 4.2

Population Comparison: East lansing vs Little falls

  • In East lansing, the population is higher at 47,340, compared to 9,094 in Little falls.
  • The median age in Little falls is higher at 40.8 years, compared to 21.4 years in East lansing.
  • Little falls has a higher median income of $44,455, compared to $44,094 in East lansing.
  • In Little falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 18.0% in East lansing.
  • East lansing has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 11% in Little falls.
  • Little falls has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.7% in East lansing.

Demographics

Demographics East lansing vs Little falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic East lansing Little falls
Black 7 Data is updating
White 73 95
Asian 9 1
Hispanic 5 1
Two or More Races 6 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: East lansing vs Little falls

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in East lansing at 7% compared to 0% in Little falls.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Little falls at 95% compared to 73% in East lansing.
  • The Asian population is larger in East lansing at 9% compared to 1% in Little falls.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in East lansing at 5% compared to 1% in Little falls.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in East lansing at 6% compared to 3% in Little falls.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both East lansing and Little falls at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric East lansing Little falls
Mental Health Not Good 17.5% 16.6%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 10.9%
Depression 25.7% 25.0%
Smoking 15.2% 22.3%
Binge Drinking 16.0% 20.6%
Obesity 36.3% 38.5%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: East lansing vs Little falls

  • More residents in East lansing report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 16.6% in Little falls.
  • Depression is more prevalent in East lansing at 25.7% compared to 25.0% in Little falls.
  • Little falls has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 15.2% in East lansing.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Little falls at 20.6% compared to 16.0% in East lansing.
  • Little falls has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 36.3% in East lansing.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Little falls at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in East lansing.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level East lansing Little falls
No Schooling 0.1% (26) 0.7% (63)
High School Diploma 3.3% (1,539) 25.4% (2,308)
Less than High School 0.9% (428) 11.7% (1,063)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.1% (9,975) 14.3% (1,301)

Education Levels Comparison: East lansing vs Little falls

  • In Little falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.1% in East lansing.
  • In Little falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.4% compared to 3.3% in East lansing.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Little falls at 11.7%, compared to 0.9% in East lansing.
  • A higher percentage of residents in East lansing hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.1% compared to 14.3% in Little falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.