Demographics details for Earlsboro, OK vs Grove city, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Earlsboro, OK vs Grove city, OH.
| Data | Earlsboro | Grove city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 605 | 42,233 |
| Median Age | 41.8 years | 40.6 years |
| Median Income | $64,063 | $84,765 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Earlsboro vs Grove city
- The population in Grove city is higher at 42,233, compared to 605 in Earlsboro.
- Residents in Earlsboro have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 40.6 years in Grove city.
- Grove city has a higher median income of $84,765, compared to $64,063 in Earlsboro.
- In Grove city, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 35.0% in Earlsboro.
- Earlsboro has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 7% in Grove city.
- Grove city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.5% in Earlsboro.
Demographics
Demographics Earlsboro vs Grove city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Earlsboro | Grove city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 4 |
| White | 61 | 86 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 19 | 4 |
| American Indian | 9 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Earlsboro vs Grove city
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Earlsboro and Grove city at 4%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Grove city at 86% compared to 61% in Earlsboro.
- In Grove city, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Earlsboro.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Earlsboro at 7% compared to 3% in Grove city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Earlsboro at 19% compared to 4% in Grove city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Earlsboro at 9% compared to 0% in Grove city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Earlsboro | Grove city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 25.1% |
| Smoking | 20.4% | 16.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 20.7% |
| Obesity | 41.5% | 33.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Earlsboro vs Grove city
- More residents in Earlsboro report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 17.0% in Grove city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Grove city at 25.1% versus 24.9% in Earlsboro.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Earlsboro at 20.4% compared to 16.5% in Grove city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grove city at 20.7% compared to 14.6% in Earlsboro.
- Obesity rates are higher in Earlsboro at 41.5% compared to 33.1% in Grove city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Earlsboro at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Grove city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Earlsboro | Grove city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (302) |
| High School Diploma | 17.2% (104) | 18.7% (7,916) |
| Less than High School | 15.5% (94) | 8.5% (3,598) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (67) | 22.9% (9,679) |
Education Levels Comparison: Earlsboro vs Grove city
- In Grove city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Earlsboro.
- In Grove city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.7% compared to 17.2% in Earlsboro.
- More residents in Earlsboro have less than a high school education at 15.5% compared to 8.5% in Grove city.
- In Grove city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.9% compared to 11.1% in Earlsboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.