Demographics details for Earlham, IA vs Zellwood, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Earlham, IA vs Zellwood, FL.
| Data | Earlham | Zellwood |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,423 | 2,850 |
| Median Age | 41.1 years | 62.9 years |
| Median Income | $103,977 | $56,733 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 59.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Earlham vs Zellwood
- The population in Zellwood is higher at 2,850, compared to 1,423 in Earlham.
- The median age in Zellwood is higher at 62.9 years, compared to 41.1 years in Earlham.
- Earlham has a higher median income of $103,977 compared to $56,733 in Zellwood.
- In Zellwood, the percentage of married families is higher at 59.0%, compared to 45.0% in Earlham.
- The poverty level is higher in Zellwood at 7%, compared to 5% in Earlham.
- Zellwood has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.2% in Earlham.
Demographics
Demographics Earlham vs Zellwood provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Earlham | Zellwood |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 5 |
| White | 95 | 62 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 7 |
Demographics Comparison: Earlham vs Zellwood
- In Zellwood, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 2% in Earlham.
- Earlham has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 62% in Zellwood.
- Both Earlham and Zellwood have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Zellwood has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 1% in Earlham.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Zellwood at 8%, compared to 2% in Earlham.
- In Zellwood, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 7%, compared to 0% in Earlham.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Earlham | Zellwood |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 15.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 18.4% | 18.0% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 16.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.0% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 27.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Earlham vs Zellwood
- In Zellwood, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 14.4% in Earlham.
- Depression is more prevalent in Earlham at 18.4% compared to 18.0% in Zellwood.
- Zellwood has a higher smoking rate at 16.8% compared to 14.6% in Earlham.
- Binge drinking is more common in Earlham at 23.0% compared to 16.8% in Zellwood.
- Obesity rates are higher in Earlham at 37.3% compared to 27.0% in Zellwood.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Zellwood at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Earlham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Earlham | Zellwood |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (10) | 3.3% (93) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (197) | 23.6% (672) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (85) | 16.2% (462) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.0% (242) | 10.3% (293) |
Education Levels Comparison: Earlham vs Zellwood
- In Zellwood, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 0.7% in Earlham.
- In Zellwood, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.6% compared to 13.8% in Earlham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Zellwood at 16.2%, compared to 6.0% in Earlham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Earlham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 10.3% in Zellwood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.