Demographics details for Earlham, IA vs Sugar grove, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Earlham, IA vs Sugar grove, NC.
| Data | Earlham | Sugar grove |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,423 | 100 |
| Median Age | 41.1 years | 38.0 years |
| Median Income | $103,977 | $50,000 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Earlham vs Sugar grove
- In Earlham, the population is higher at 1,423, compared to 100 in Sugar grove.
- Residents in Earlham have a higher median age of 41.1 years compared to 38.0 years in Sugar grove.
- Earlham has a higher median income of $103,977 compared to $50,000 in Sugar grove.
- In Sugar grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 45.0% in Earlham.
- The poverty level is higher in Sugar grove at 10%, compared to 5% in Earlham.
- Sugar grove has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Earlham.
Demographics
Demographics Earlham vs Sugar grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Earlham | Sugar grove |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 95 | 100 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 2 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Earlham vs Sugar grove
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Earlham at 2% compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sugar grove at 100% compared to 95% in Earlham.
- Both Earlham and Sugar grove have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Earlham at 1% compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Earlham at 2% compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Earlham and Sugar grove at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Earlham | Sugar grove |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 18.4% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.0% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Earlham vs Sugar grove
- More residents in Earlham report poor mental health at 14.4% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
- Depression is more prevalent in Earlham at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Earlham at 14.6% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
- Binge drinking is more common in Earlham at 23.0% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
- Obesity rates are higher in Earlham at 37.3% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
- Disability percentages are higher in Earlham at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Earlham | Sugar grove |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (10) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (197) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (85) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.0% (242) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Earlham vs Sugar grove
- A higher percentage of residents in Earlham have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Earlham hold a high school diploma at 13.8% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
- More residents in Earlham have less than a high school education at 6.0% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Earlham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.