Demographics details for Earlham, IA vs Pell city, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Earlham, IA vs Pell city, AL.
| Data | Earlham | Pell city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,423 | 13,638 |
| Median Age | 41.1 years | 38.7 years |
| Median Income | $103,977 | $71,027 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Earlham vs Pell city
- The population in Pell city is higher at 13,638, compared to 1,423 in Earlham.
- Residents in Earlham have a higher median age of 41.1 years compared to 38.7 years in Pell city.
- Earlham has a higher median income of $103,977 compared to $71,027 in Pell city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Earlham at 45.0% compared to 43.0% in Pell city.
- The poverty level is higher in Pell city at 12%, compared to 5% in Earlham.
- Pell city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Earlham.
Demographics
Demographics Earlham vs Pell city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Earlham | Pell city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 17 |
| White | 95 | 78 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Earlham vs Pell city
- In Pell city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 2% in Earlham.
- Earlham has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 78% in Pell city.
- In Pell city, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Earlham.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Earlham and Pell city at 1%.
- Both Earlham and Pell city have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 2%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Earlham and Pell city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Earlham | Pell city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 18.4% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 20.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.0% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 41.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Earlham vs Pell city
- In Pell city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 14.4% in Earlham.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pell city at 24.7% versus 18.4% in Earlham.
- Pell city has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 14.6% in Earlham.
- Binge drinking is more common in Earlham at 23.0% compared to 14.6% in Pell city.
- Pell city has higher obesity rates at 41.0% compared to 37.3% in Earlham.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pell city at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Earlham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Earlham | Pell city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (10) | 0.8% (109) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (197) | 18.9% (2,574) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (85) | 12.9% (1,759) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.0% (242) | 13.9% (1,899) |
Education Levels Comparison: Earlham vs Pell city
- In Pell city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in Earlham.
- In Pell city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.9% compared to 13.8% in Earlham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pell city at 12.9%, compared to 6.0% in Earlham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Earlham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 13.9% in Pell city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.