Demographics details for Earlham, IA vs Milford, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Earlham, IA vs Milford, CT.
| Data | Earlham | Milford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,423 | 50,471 |
| Median Age | 41.1 years | 46.6 years |
| Median Income | $103,977 | $104,503 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Earlham vs Milford
- The population in Milford is higher at 50,471, compared to 1,423 in Earlham.
- The median age in Milford is higher at 46.6 years, compared to 41.1 years in Earlham.
- Milford has a higher median income of $104,503, compared to $103,977 in Earlham.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Earlham and Milford at 45.0%.
- The poverty level is identical in both Earlham and Milford at 5%.
- Milford has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Earlham.
Demographics
Demographics Earlham vs Milford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Earlham | Milford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 95 | 79 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Earlham vs Milford
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Earlham and Milford at 2%.
- Earlham has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 79% in Milford.
- In Milford, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Earlham.
- Milford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 1% in Earlham.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Milford at 6%, compared to 2% in Earlham.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Earlham and Milford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Earlham | Milford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 7.9% |
| Depression | 18.4% | 20.5% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 12.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.0% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 27.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Earlham vs Milford
- More residents in Earlham report poor mental health at 14.4% compared to 13.2% in Milford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Milford at 20.5% versus 18.4% in Earlham.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Earlham at 14.6% compared to 12.7% in Milford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Earlham at 23.0% compared to 17.0% in Milford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Earlham at 37.3% compared to 27.5% in Milford.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Earlham and Milford at 10.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Earlham | Milford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (10) | 0.7% (366) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (197) | 16.7% (8,431) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (85) | 6.6% (3,307) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.0% (242) | 36.0% (18,184) |
Education Levels Comparison: Earlham vs Milford
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Earlham and Milford at 0.7%.
- In Milford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.7% compared to 13.8% in Earlham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Milford at 6.6%, compared to 6.0% in Earlham.
- In Milford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.0% compared to 17.0% in Earlham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.