Demographics details for Earlham, IA vs Henderson, NV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Earlham, IA vs Henderson, NV.
| Data | Earlham | Henderson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,423 | 331,415 |
| Median Age | 41.1 years | 42.3 years |
| Median Income | $103,977 | $85,311 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Earlham vs Henderson
- The population in Henderson is higher at 331,415, compared to 1,423 in Earlham.
- The median age in Henderson is higher at 42.3 years, compared to 41.1 years in Earlham.
- Earlham has a higher median income of $103,977 compared to $85,311 in Henderson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Earlham at 45.0% compared to 40.0% in Henderson.
- Earlham has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Henderson.
- Henderson has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 3.2% in Earlham.
Demographics
Demographics Earlham vs Henderson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Earlham | Henderson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 6 |
| White | 95 | 56 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 9 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Earlham vs Henderson
- In Henderson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 2% in Earlham.
- Earlham has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 56% in Henderson.
- In Henderson, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Earlham.
- Henderson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 1% in Earlham.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Henderson at 10%, compared to 2% in Earlham.
- In Henderson, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Earlham.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Earlham | Henderson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 18.4% | 19.5% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 14.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.0% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 28.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Earlham vs Henderson
- In Henderson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 14.4% in Earlham.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Henderson at 19.5% versus 18.4% in Earlham.
- Henderson has a higher smoking rate at 14.7% compared to 14.6% in Earlham.
- Binge drinking is more common in Earlham at 23.0% compared to 14.7% in Henderson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Earlham at 37.3% compared to 28.6% in Henderson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Henderson at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Earlham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Earlham | Henderson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (10) | 0.7% (2,336) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (197) | 14.1% (46,801) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (85) | 8.1% (26,764) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.0% (242) | 24.6% (81,415) |
Education Levels Comparison: Earlham vs Henderson
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Earlham and Henderson at 0.7%.
- In Henderson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.1% compared to 13.8% in Earlham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Henderson at 8.1%, compared to 6.0% in Earlham.
- In Henderson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.6% compared to 17.0% in Earlham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.