Demographics details for Earlham, IA vs Harlowton, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Earlham, IA vs Harlowton, MT.
| Data | Earlham | Harlowton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,423 | 933 |
| Median Age | 41.1 years | 50.7 years |
| Median Income | $103,977 | $55,536 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Earlham vs Harlowton
- In Earlham, the population is higher at 1,423, compared to 933 in Harlowton.
- The median age in Harlowton is higher at 50.7 years, compared to 41.1 years in Earlham.
- Earlham has a higher median income of $103,977 compared to $55,536 in Harlowton.
- In Harlowton, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 45.0% in Earlham.
- The poverty level is higher in Harlowton at 15%, compared to 5% in Earlham.
- The unemployment rate in Earlham is higher at 3.2%, compared to 3.0% in Harlowton.
Demographics
Demographics Earlham vs Harlowton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Earlham | Harlowton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 95 | 90 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Earlham vs Harlowton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Earlham at 2% compared to 0% in Harlowton.
- Earlham has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 90% in Harlowton.
- Both Earlham and Harlowton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Harlowton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 1% in Earlham.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Earlham at 2% compared to 1% in Harlowton.
- In Harlowton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Earlham.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Earlham | Harlowton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 18.4% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 21.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.0% | 21.7% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 36.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Earlham vs Harlowton
- In Harlowton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 14.4% in Earlham.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Harlowton at 25.7% versus 18.4% in Earlham.
- Harlowton has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 14.6% in Earlham.
- Binge drinking is more common in Earlham at 23.0% compared to 21.7% in Harlowton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Earlham at 37.3% compared to 36.0% in Harlowton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Harlowton at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Earlham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Earlham | Harlowton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (10) | 0.5% (5) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (197) | 30.1% (281) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (85) | 17.0% (159) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.0% (242) | 10.6% (99) |
Education Levels Comparison: Earlham vs Harlowton
- A higher percentage of residents in Earlham have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Harlowton.
- In Harlowton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.1% compared to 13.8% in Earlham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Harlowton at 17.0%, compared to 6.0% in Earlham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Earlham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 10.6% in Harlowton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.