Demographics details for Earlham, IA vs Butte, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Earlham, IA vs Butte, MT.
| Data | Earlham | Butte |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,423 | 35,416 |
| Median Age | 41.1 years | 40.2 years |
| Median Income | $103,977 | $56,522 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Earlham vs Butte
- The population in Butte is higher at 35,416, compared to 1,423 in Earlham.
- Residents in Earlham have a higher median age of 41.1 years compared to 40.2 years in Butte.
- Earlham has a higher median income of $103,977 compared to $56,522 in Butte.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Earlham at 45.0% compared to 36.0% in Butte.
- The poverty level is higher in Butte at 12%, compared to 5% in Earlham.
- Butte has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Earlham.
Demographics
Demographics Earlham vs Butte provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Earlham | Butte |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 95 | 89 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Earlham vs Butte
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Earlham at 2% compared to 0% in Butte.
- Earlham has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 89% in Butte.
- Both Earlham and Butte have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Butte has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 1% in Earlham.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Butte at 4%, compared to 2% in Earlham.
- In Butte, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Earlham.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Earlham | Butte |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 11.5% |
| Depression | 18.4% | 25.6% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 18.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.0% | 23.0% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 32.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Earlham vs Butte
- In Butte, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 14.4% in Earlham.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Butte at 25.6% versus 18.4% in Earlham.
- Butte has a higher smoking rate at 18.4% compared to 14.6% in Earlham.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Earlham and Butte at 23.0%.
- Obesity rates are higher in Earlham at 37.3% compared to 32.5% in Butte.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Butte at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Earlham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Earlham | Butte |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (10) | 0.5% (181) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (197) | 17.7% (6,267) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (85) | 8.4% (2,983) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.0% (242) | 18.7% (6,615) |
Education Levels Comparison: Earlham vs Butte
- A higher percentage of residents in Earlham have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Butte.
- In Butte, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.7% compared to 13.8% in Earlham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Butte at 8.4%, compared to 6.0% in Earlham.
- In Butte, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 17.0% in Earlham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.