Demographics details for Earlham, IA vs Big springs, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Earlham, IA vs Big springs, NE.
| Data | Earlham | Big springs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,423 | 408 |
| Median Age | 41.1 years | 53.5 years |
| Median Income | $103,977 | $65,694 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 55.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Earlham vs Big springs
- In Earlham, the population is higher at 1,423, compared to 408 in Big springs.
- The median age in Big springs is higher at 53.5 years, compared to 41.1 years in Earlham.
- Earlham has a higher median income of $103,977 compared to $65,694 in Big springs.
- In Big springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 55.0%, compared to 45.0% in Earlham.
- The poverty level is higher in Big springs at 10%, compared to 5% in Earlham.
- Big springs has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Earlham.
Demographics
Demographics Earlham vs Big springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Earlham | Big springs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 95 | 75 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Earlham vs Big springs
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Earlham at 2% compared to 0% in Big springs.
- Earlham has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 75% in Big springs.
- Both Earlham and Big springs have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Big springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 1% in Earlham.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Big springs at 7%, compared to 2% in Earlham.
- In Big springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Earlham.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Earlham | Big springs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 18.4% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.0% | 21.1% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Earlham vs Big springs
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Earlham and Big springs at 14.4%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Earlham at 18.4% compared to 17.8% in Big springs.
- Big springs has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 14.6% in Earlham.
- Binge drinking is more common in Earlham at 23.0% compared to 21.1% in Big springs.
- Big springs has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 37.3% in Earlham.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Big springs at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Earlham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Earlham | Big springs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (10) | 0.7% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (197) | 19.4% (79) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (85) | 22.1% (90) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.0% (242) | 16.7% (68) |
Education Levels Comparison: Earlham vs Big springs
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Earlham and Big springs at 0.7%.
- In Big springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.4% compared to 13.8% in Earlham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Big springs at 22.1%, compared to 6.0% in Earlham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Earlham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 16.7% in Big springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.