Demographics details for Earlham, IA vs Beaverton, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Earlham, IA vs Beaverton, OR.
| Data | Earlham | Beaverton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,423 | 97,053 |
| Median Age | 41.1 years | 36.7 years |
| Median Income | $103,977 | $88,899 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Earlham vs Beaverton
- The population in Beaverton is higher at 97,053, compared to 1,423 in Earlham.
- Residents in Earlham have a higher median age of 41.1 years compared to 36.7 years in Beaverton.
- Earlham has a higher median income of $103,977 compared to $88,899 in Beaverton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Earlham at 45.0% compared to 38.0% in Beaverton.
- The poverty level is higher in Beaverton at 7%, compared to 5% in Earlham.
- Beaverton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.2% in Earlham.
Demographics
Demographics Earlham vs Beaverton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Earlham | Beaverton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 3 |
| White | 95 | 57 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 12 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Earlham vs Beaverton
- In Beaverton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Earlham.
- Earlham has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 57% in Beaverton.
- In Beaverton, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 0% in Earlham.
- Beaverton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 1% in Earlham.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Beaverton at 10%, compared to 2% in Earlham.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Earlham and Beaverton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Earlham | Beaverton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 9.3% |
| Depression | 18.4% | 22.9% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 10.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.0% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 31.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Earlham vs Beaverton
- In Beaverton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 14.4% in Earlham.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Beaverton at 22.9% versus 18.4% in Earlham.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Earlham at 14.6% compared to 10.9% in Beaverton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Earlham at 23.0% compared to 16.6% in Beaverton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Earlham at 37.3% compared to 31.3% in Beaverton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Beaverton at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Earlham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Earlham | Beaverton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (10) | 0.6% (619) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (197) | 9.8% (9,471) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (85) | 7.2% (7,010) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.0% (242) | 34.9% (33,872) |
Education Levels Comparison: Earlham vs Beaverton
- A higher percentage of residents in Earlham have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Beaverton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Earlham hold a high school diploma at 13.8% compared to 9.8% in Beaverton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Beaverton at 7.2%, compared to 6.0% in Earlham.
- In Beaverton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.9% compared to 17.0% in Earlham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.