Demographics details for Earl park, IN vs Lincoln, RI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Earl park, IN vs Lincoln, RI.
| Data | Earl park | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 362 | 21,105 |
| Median Age | 50.6 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $62,750 | $85,000 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Earl park vs Lincoln
- The population in Lincoln is higher at 21,105, compared to 362 in Earl park.
- Residents in Earl park have a higher median age of 50.6 years compared to 41.5 years in Lincoln.
- Lincoln has a higher median income of $85,000, compared to $62,750 in Earl park.
- In Lincoln, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 38.0% in Earl park.
- The poverty level is higher in Lincoln at 5%, compared to 0% in Earl park.
- Lincoln has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.2% in Earl park.
Demographics
Demographics Earl park vs Lincoln provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Earl park | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 4 |
| White | 89 | 90 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Earl park vs Lincoln
- In Lincoln, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 1% in Earl park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lincoln at 90% compared to 89% in Earl park.
- In Lincoln, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Earl park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Earl park at 4% compared to 3% in Lincoln.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Earl park at 6% compared to 2% in Lincoln.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Earl park and Lincoln at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Earl park | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 28.0% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 24.6% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 41.7% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Earl park vs Lincoln
- More residents in Earl park report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 0.0% in Lincoln.
- Depression is more prevalent in Earl park at 28.0% compared to 0.0% in Lincoln.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Earl park at 24.6% compared to 0.0% in Lincoln.
- Binge drinking is more common in Earl park at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in Lincoln.
- Obesity rates are higher in Earl park at 41.7% compared to 0.0% in Lincoln.
- Disability percentages are higher in Earl park at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Lincoln.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Earl park | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 21.5% (78) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (42) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (32) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Earl park vs Lincoln
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Earl park and Lincoln at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Earl park hold a high school diploma at 21.5% compared to 0.0% in Lincoln.
- More residents in Earl park have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 0.0% in Lincoln.
- A higher percentage of residents in Earl park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.8% compared to 0.0% in Lincoln.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.