Demographics details for Earl park, IN vs Lakewood, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Earl park, IN vs Lakewood, CO.
| Data | Earl park | Lakewood |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 362 | 156,120 |
| Median Age | 50.6 years | 38.1 years |
| Median Income | $62,750 | $82,786 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Earl park vs Lakewood
- The population in Lakewood is higher at 156,120, compared to 362 in Earl park.
- Residents in Earl park have a higher median age of 50.6 years compared to 38.1 years in Lakewood.
- Lakewood has a higher median income of $82,786, compared to $62,750 in Earl park.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Earl park and Lakewood at 38.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Lakewood at 9%, compared to 0% in Earl park.
- Lakewood has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.2% in Earl park.
Demographics
Demographics Earl park vs Lakewood provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Earl park | Lakewood |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 89 | 60 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 22 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Earl park vs Lakewood
- In Lakewood, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Earl park.
- Earl park has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 60% in Lakewood.
- In Lakewood, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Earl park.
- Lakewood has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 4% in Earl park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lakewood at 11%, compared to 6% in Earl park.
- In Lakewood, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Earl park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Earl park | Lakewood |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 28.0% | 20.5% |
| Smoking | 24.6% | 14.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 21.3% |
| Obesity | 41.7% | 25.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Earl park vs Lakewood
- More residents in Earl park report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 14.4% in Lakewood.
- Depression is more prevalent in Earl park at 28.0% compared to 20.5% in Lakewood.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Earl park at 24.6% compared to 14.1% in Lakewood.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lakewood at 21.3% compared to 16.9% in Earl park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Earl park at 41.7% compared to 25.3% in Lakewood.
- Disability percentages are higher in Earl park at 21.0% compared to 12.0% in Lakewood.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Earl park | Lakewood |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.0% (1,543) |
| High School Diploma | 21.5% (78) | 13.3% (20,721) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (42) | 9.7% (15,084) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (32) | 33.0% (51,471) |
Education Levels Comparison: Earl park vs Lakewood
- In Lakewood, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Earl park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Earl park hold a high school diploma at 21.5% compared to 13.3% in Lakewood.
- More residents in Earl park have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 9.7% in Lakewood.
- In Lakewood, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.0% compared to 8.8% in Earl park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.