Demographics details for Earl park, IN vs Heber springs, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Earl park, IN vs Heber springs, AR.

Data Earl park Heber springs
Population 362 7,201
Median Age 50.6 years 43.1 years
Median Income $62,750 $50,472
Married Families 38.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.0

Population Comparison: Earl park vs Heber springs

  • The population in Heber springs is higher at 7,201, compared to 362 in Earl park.
  • Residents in Earl park have a higher median age of 50.6 years compared to 43.1 years in Heber springs.
  • Earl park has a higher median income of $62,750 compared to $50,472 in Heber springs.
  • In Heber springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 38.0% in Earl park.
  • The poverty level is higher in Heber springs at 12%, compared to 0% in Earl park.
  • Heber springs has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.2% in Earl park.

Demographics

Demographics Earl park vs Heber springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Earl park Heber springs
Black 1 1
White 89 92
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 4 3
Two or More Races 6 3
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Earl park vs Heber springs

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Earl park and Heber springs at 1%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Heber springs at 92% compared to 89% in Earl park.
  • Both Earl park and Heber springs have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Earl park at 4% compared to 3% in Heber springs.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Earl park at 6% compared to 3% in Heber springs.
  • In Heber springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Earl park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Earl park Heber springs
Mental Health Not Good 19.1% 18.5%
Physical Health Not Good 13.8% 12.5%
Depression 28.0% 26.3%
Smoking 24.6% 20.5%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 16.2%
Obesity 41.7% 36.2%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Earl park vs Heber springs

  • More residents in Earl park report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.5% in Heber springs.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Earl park at 28.0% compared to 26.3% in Heber springs.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Earl park at 24.6% compared to 20.5% in Heber springs.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Earl park at 16.9% compared to 16.2% in Heber springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Earl park at 41.7% compared to 36.2% in Heber springs.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Earl park at 21.0% compared to 20.0% in Heber springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Earl park Heber springs
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 21.5% (78) 23.5% (1,694)
Less than High School 11.6% (42) 15.1% (1,088)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.8% (32) 10.5% (756)

Education Levels Comparison: Earl park vs Heber springs

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Earl park and Heber springs at 0.0%.
  • In Heber springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.5% compared to 21.5% in Earl park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Heber springs at 15.1%, compared to 11.6% in Earl park.
  • In Heber springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.5% compared to 8.8% in Earl park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.