Demographics details for Eagle pass, TX vs Litchfield, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Eagle pass, TX vs Litchfield, MN.
Data | Eagle pass | Litchfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 28,255 | 6,602 |
Median Age | 29.7 years | 45.3 years |
Median Income | $52,254 | $60,804 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 25% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 9.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Eagle pass vs Litchfield
- In Eagle pass, the population is higher at 28,255, compared to 6,602 in Litchfield.
- The median age in Litchfield is higher at 45.3 years, compared to 29.7 years in Eagle pass.
- Litchfield has a higher median income of $60,804, compared to $52,254 in Eagle pass.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Eagle pass and Litchfield at 39.0%.
- Eagle pass has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 8% in Litchfield.
- The unemployment rate in Eagle pass is higher at 9.3%, compared to 3.5% in Litchfield.
Demographics
Demographics Eagle pass vs Litchfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Eagle pass | Litchfield |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | -31 | 91 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 96 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 35 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Eagle pass vs Litchfield
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Eagle pass and Litchfield at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Litchfield at 91% compared to -31% in Eagle pass.
- Both Eagle pass and Litchfield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Eagle pass at 96% compared to 7% in Litchfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Eagle pass at 35% compared to 1% in Litchfield.
- In Litchfield, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Eagle pass.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Eagle pass | Litchfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 15.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | 10.0% |
Depression | 21.3% | 24.2% |
Smoking | 17.3% | 19.7% |
Binge Drinking | 15.4% | 20.9% |
Obesity | 43.7% | 34.7% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Eagle pass vs Litchfield
- More residents in Eagle pass report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.8% in Litchfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Litchfield at 24.2% versus 21.3% in Eagle pass.
- Litchfield has a higher smoking rate at 19.7% compared to 17.3% in Eagle pass.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Litchfield at 20.9% compared to 15.4% in Eagle pass.
- Obesity rates are higher in Eagle pass at 43.7% compared to 34.7% in Litchfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Litchfield at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Eagle pass.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Eagle pass | Litchfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (470) | 0.0% (1) |
High School Diploma | 11.8% (3,345) | 23.0% (1,520) |
Less than High School | 30.2% (8,525) | 7.1% (472) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.5% (4,084) | 13.5% (888) |
Education Levels Comparison: Eagle pass vs Litchfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Eagle pass have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- In Litchfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.0% compared to 11.8% in Eagle pass.
- More residents in Eagle pass have less than a high school education at 30.2% compared to 7.1% in Litchfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Eagle pass hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.5% compared to 13.5% in Litchfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.