Demographics details for Eagle lake, MN vs Garfield, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Eagle lake, MN vs Garfield, WA.
| Data | Eagle lake | Garfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,273 | 2,363 |
| Median Age | 32.2 years | 49.9 years |
| Median Income | $87,130 | $57,958 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 57.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Eagle lake vs Garfield
- In Eagle lake, the population is higher at 3,273, compared to 2,363 in Garfield.
- The median age in Garfield is higher at 49.9 years, compared to 32.2 years in Eagle lake.
- Eagle lake has a higher median income of $87,130 compared to $57,958 in Garfield.
- In Garfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 57.0%, compared to 38.0% in Eagle lake.
- Eagle lake has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 0% in Garfield.
- Garfield has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 3.0% in Eagle lake.
Demographics
Demographics Eagle lake vs Garfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Eagle lake | Garfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 88 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Eagle lake vs Garfield
- In Garfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Eagle lake.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Eagle lake and Garfield at 88%.
- In Garfield, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Eagle lake.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Eagle lake and Garfield at 4%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Eagle lake at 8% compared to 6% in Garfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Eagle lake and Garfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Eagle lake | Garfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.0% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.3% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 28.7% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.0% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 33.9% | 40.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Eagle lake vs Garfield
- In Garfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 14.0% in Eagle lake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Garfield at 28.7% versus 23.5% in Eagle lake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Eagle lake at 15.0% compared to 14.6% in Garfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Eagle lake at 22.0% compared to 18.2% in Garfield.
- Garfield has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 33.9% in Eagle lake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Garfield at 23.0% compared to 8.0% in Eagle lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Eagle lake | Garfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (455) | 15.7% (371) |
| Less than High School | 3.8% (124) | 10.2% (242) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.4% (702) | 19.4% (458) |
Education Levels Comparison: Eagle lake vs Garfield
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Eagle lake and Garfield at 0.0%.
- In Garfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.7% compared to 13.9% in Eagle lake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Garfield at 10.2%, compared to 3.8% in Eagle lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Eagle lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.4% compared to 19.4% in Garfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.