Demographics details for Durham, NC vs Port lavaca, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Durham, NC vs Port lavaca, TX.
Data | Durham | Port lavaca |
---|---|---|
Population | 291,928 | 11,262 |
Median Age | 34.7 years | 34.8 years |
Median Income | $74,710 | $58,871 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Durham vs Port lavaca
- In Durham, the population is higher at 291,928, compared to 11,262 in Port lavaca.
- The median age in Port lavaca is higher at 34.8 years, compared to 34.7 years in Durham.
- Durham has a higher median income of $74,710 compared to $58,871 in Port lavaca.
- In Port lavaca, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 33.0% in Durham.
- The poverty level is higher in Port lavaca at 15%, compared to 13% in Durham.
- Port lavaca has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.6% in Durham.
Demographics
Demographics Durham vs Port lavaca provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Durham | Port lavaca |
---|---|---|
Black | 35 | 5 |
White | 39 | 6 |
Asian | 6 | 7 |
Hispanic | 13 | 64 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 18 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Durham vs Port lavaca
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Durham at 35% compared to 5% in Port lavaca.
- Durham has a higher percentage of White residents at 39% compared to 6% in Port lavaca.
- In Port lavaca, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 6% in Durham.
- Port lavaca has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 64%, compared to 13% in Durham.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port lavaca at 18%, compared to 7% in Durham.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Durham and Port lavaca at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Durham | Port lavaca |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 17.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 13.3% |
Depression | 19.5% | 21.5% |
Smoking | 14.7% | 17.5% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 31.7% | 38.4% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Durham vs Port lavaca
- In Port lavaca, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 15.0% in Durham.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Port lavaca at 21.5% versus 19.5% in Durham.
- Port lavaca has a higher smoking rate at 17.5% compared to 14.7% in Durham.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Port lavaca at 16.9% compared to 16.7% in Durham.
- Port lavaca has higher obesity rates at 38.4% compared to 31.7% in Durham.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port lavaca at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Durham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Durham | Port lavaca |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (2,889) | 2.0% (230) |
High School Diploma | 9.1% (26,701) | 21.3% (2,404) |
Less than High School | 9.2% (26,742) | 24.2% (2,728) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.9% (104,893) | 9.7% (1,091) |
Education Levels Comparison: Durham vs Port lavaca
- In Port lavaca, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.0% in Durham.
- In Port lavaca, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.3% compared to 9.1% in Durham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Port lavaca at 24.2%, compared to 9.2% in Durham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Durham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.9% compared to 9.7% in Port lavaca.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.