Demographics details for Durham, NC vs Baldwin park, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Durham, NC vs Baldwin park, CA.
Data | Durham | Baldwin park |
---|---|---|
Population | 291,928 | 69,455 |
Median Age | 34.7 years | 37.1 years |
Median Income | $74,710 | $76,002 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 6.3 |
Population Comparison: Durham vs Baldwin park
- In Durham, the population is higher at 291,928, compared to 69,455 in Baldwin park.
- The median age in Baldwin park is higher at 37.1 years, compared to 34.7 years in Durham.
- Baldwin park has a higher median income of $76,002, compared to $74,710 in Durham.
- In Baldwin park, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 33.0% in Durham.
- Durham has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Baldwin park.
- Baldwin park has a higher unemployment rate at 6.3% compared to 3.6% in Durham.
Demographics
Demographics Durham vs Baldwin park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Durham | Baldwin park |
---|---|---|
Black | 35 | 1 |
White | 39 | -25 |
Asian | 6 | 23 |
Hispanic | 13 | 75 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 23 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Durham vs Baldwin park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Durham at 35% compared to 1% in Baldwin park.
- Durham has a higher percentage of White residents at 39% compared to -25% in Baldwin park.
- In Baldwin park, the Asian population stands at 23%, greater than 6% in Durham.
- Baldwin park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 13% in Durham.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Baldwin park at 23%, compared to 7% in Durham.
- In Baldwin park, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Durham.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Durham | Baldwin park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 15.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 12.7% |
Depression | 19.5% | 14.7% |
Smoking | 14.7% | 11.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 14.2% |
Obesity | 31.7% | 29.9% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Durham vs Baldwin park
- In Baldwin park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 15.0% in Durham.
- Depression is more prevalent in Durham at 19.5% compared to 14.7% in Baldwin park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Durham at 14.7% compared to 11.4% in Baldwin park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Durham at 16.7% compared to 14.2% in Baldwin park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Durham at 31.7% compared to 29.9% in Baldwin park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Baldwin park at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Durham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Durham | Baldwin park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (2,889) | 5.5% (3,853) |
High School Diploma | 9.1% (26,701) | 18.1% (12,587) |
Less than High School | 9.2% (26,742) | 41.7% (28,939) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.9% (104,893) | 9.8% (6,787) |
Education Levels Comparison: Durham vs Baldwin park
- In Baldwin park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 1.0% in Durham.
- In Baldwin park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.1% compared to 9.1% in Durham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Baldwin park at 41.7%, compared to 9.2% in Durham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Durham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.9% compared to 9.8% in Baldwin park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.