Demographics details for Durango, CO vs Fort payne, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Durango, CO vs Fort payne, AL.
| Data | Durango | Fort payne |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,531 | 14,879 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $76,177 | $44,549 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Durango vs Fort payne
- In Durango, the population is higher at 19,531, compared to 14,879 in Fort payne.
- The median age in Fort payne is higher at 39.7 years, compared to 36.6 years in Durango.
- Durango has a higher median income of $76,177 compared to $44,549 in Fort payne.
- In Fort payne, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 36.0% in Durango.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort payne at 11%, compared to 8% in Durango.
- The unemployment rate in Durango is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.5% in Fort payne.
Demographics
Demographics Durango vs Fort payne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Durango | Fort payne |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 76 | 72 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
| American Indian | 7 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Durango vs Fort payne
- In Fort payne, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Durango.
- Durango has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 72% in Fort payne.
- The Asian population is larger in Durango at 1% compared to 0% in Fort payne.
- Fort payne has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 8% in Durango.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Durango at 7% compared to 4% in Fort payne.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Durango at 7% compared to 2% in Fort payne.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Durango | Fort payne |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 21.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 16.1% |
| Depression | 22.1% | 26.0% |
| Smoking | 12.3% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 14.3% |
| Obesity | 20.9% | 41.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Durango vs Fort payne
- In Fort payne, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 14.6% in Durango.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort payne at 26.0% versus 22.1% in Durango.
- Fort payne has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 12.3% in Durango.
- Binge drinking is more common in Durango at 19.1% compared to 14.3% in Fort payne.
- Fort payne has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 20.9% in Durango.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort payne at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Durango.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Durango | Fort payne |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.7% (402) |
| High School Diploma | 7.3% (1,420) | 14.2% (2,110) |
| Less than High School | 3.4% (656) | 27.9% (4,155) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.0% (7,618) | 11.9% (1,767) |
Education Levels Comparison: Durango vs Fort payne
- In Fort payne, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Durango.
- In Fort payne, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.2% compared to 7.3% in Durango.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort payne at 27.9%, compared to 3.4% in Durango.
- A higher percentage of residents in Durango hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.0% compared to 11.9% in Fort payne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.