Demographics details for Dunedin, FL vs Coalinga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dunedin, FL vs Coalinga, CA.
| Data | Dunedin | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 36,059 | 17,024 |
| Median Age | 57.8 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $63,824 | $68,976 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Dunedin vs Coalinga
- In Dunedin, the population is higher at 36,059, compared to 17,024 in Coalinga.
- Residents in Dunedin have a higher median age of 57.8 years compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher median income of $68,976, compared to $63,824 in Dunedin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Dunedin at 45.0% compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- The poverty level is higher in Coalinga at 15%, compared to 6% in Dunedin.
- Coalinga has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 3.3% in Dunedin.
Demographics
Demographics Dunedin vs Coalinga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dunedin | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 4 |
| White | 83 | 9 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 65 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Dunedin vs Coalinga
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Dunedin and Coalinga at 4%.
- Dunedin has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- In Coalinga, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Dunedin.
- Coalinga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 65%, compared to 6% in Dunedin.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coalinga at 18%, compared to 6% in Dunedin.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Dunedin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dunedin | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 16.4% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 26.7% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dunedin vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 16.2% in Dunedin.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dunedin at 19.7% compared to 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Dunedin at 19.3% compared to 17.2% in Coalinga.
- Binge drinking is more common in Dunedin at 18.2% compared to 15.9% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 26.7% in Dunedin.
- Disability percentages are higher in Dunedin at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Coalinga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dunedin | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (117) | 3.2% (537) |
| High School Diploma | 19.6% (7,051) | 13.8% (2,349) |
| Less than High School | 7.7% (2,791) | 39.2% (6,672) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.1% (10,854) | 8.1% (1,380) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dunedin vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.3% in Dunedin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dunedin hold a high school diploma at 19.6% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Coalinga at 39.2%, compared to 7.7% in Dunedin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dunedin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.