Demographics details for Dundas, MN vs Grand junction, CO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Dundas, MN vs Grand junction, CO.

Data Dundas Grand junction
Population 1,744 68,034
Median Age 37.2 years 39.9 years
Median Income $113,125 $62,993
Married Families 50.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 3% 10%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 4.7

Population Comparison: Dundas vs Grand junction

  • The population in Grand junction is higher at 68,034, compared to 1,744 in Dundas.
  • The median age in Grand junction is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 37.2 years in Dundas.
  • Dundas has a higher median income of $113,125 compared to $62,993 in Grand junction.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Dundas at 50.0% compared to 35.0% in Grand junction.
  • The poverty level is higher in Grand junction at 10%, compared to 3% in Dundas.
  • Grand junction has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 2.5% in Dundas.

Demographics

Demographics Dundas vs Grand junction provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Dundas Grand junction
Black Data is updating 1
White 89 73
Asian 3 1
Hispanic 4 16
Two or More Races 4 8
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Dundas vs Grand junction

  • In Grand junction, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Dundas.
  • Dundas has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 73% in Grand junction.
  • The Asian population is larger in Dundas at 3% compared to 1% in Grand junction.
  • Grand junction has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 4% in Dundas.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grand junction at 8%, compared to 4% in Dundas.
  • In Grand junction, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Dundas.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Dundas Grand junction
Mental Health Not Good 13.8% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 8.3% 11.8%
Depression 21.1% 24.5%
Smoking 15.1% 17.3%
Binge Drinking 20.5% 19.2%
Obesity 35.7% 29.2%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Dundas vs Grand junction

  • In Grand junction, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 13.8% in Dundas.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Grand junction at 24.5% versus 21.1% in Dundas.
  • Grand junction has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 15.1% in Dundas.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Dundas at 20.5% compared to 19.2% in Grand junction.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Dundas at 35.7% compared to 29.2% in Grand junction.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grand junction at 15.0% compared to 7.0% in Dundas.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Dundas Grand junction
No Schooling 0.4% (7) 0.4% (245)
High School Diploma 10.6% (185) 13.9% (9,476)
Less than High School 6.0% (105) 9.7% (6,605)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 25.4% (443) 23.8% (16,201)

Education Levels Comparison: Dundas vs Grand junction

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Dundas and Grand junction at 0.4%.
  • In Grand junction, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 10.6% in Dundas.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Grand junction at 9.7%, compared to 6.0% in Dundas.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Dundas hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.4% compared to 23.8% in Grand junction.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.