Demographics details for Duncanville, TX vs Washington, ME
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Duncanville, TX vs Washington, ME.
Data | Duncanville | Washington |
---|---|---|
Population | 39,413 | 31,437 |
Median Age | 36.9 years | 48.6 years |
Median Income | $66,601 | $51,669 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Duncanville vs Washington
- In Duncanville, the population is higher at 39,413, compared to 31,437 in Washington.
- The median age in Washington is higher at 48.6 years, compared to 36.9 years in Duncanville.
- Duncanville has a higher median income of $66,601 compared to $51,669 in Washington.
- In Washington, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 36.0% in Duncanville.
- Duncanville has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 8% in Washington.
- The unemployment rate in Duncanville is higher at 4.7%, compared to 3.5% in Washington.
Demographics
Demographics Duncanville vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Duncanville | Washington |
---|---|---|
Black | 33 | 1 |
White | 10 | 87 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 43 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Duncanville vs Washington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Duncanville at 33% compared to 1% in Washington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Washington at 87% compared to 10% in Duncanville.
- The Asian population is larger in Duncanville at 2% compared to 0% in Washington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Duncanville at 43% compared to 3% in Washington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Duncanville at 11% compared to 4% in Washington.
- In Washington, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 1% in Duncanville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Duncanville | Washington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 19.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 12.4% |
Depression | 22.0% | 27.9% |
Smoking | 16.9% | 21.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 17.8% |
Obesity | 36.6% | 37.0% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Duncanville vs Washington
- In Washington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 17.2% in Duncanville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Washington at 27.9% versus 22.0% in Duncanville.
- Washington has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 16.9% in Duncanville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Washington at 17.8% compared to 17.6% in Duncanville.
- Washington has higher obesity rates at 37.0% compared to 36.6% in Duncanville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Washington at 22.0% compared to 12.0% in Duncanville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Duncanville | Washington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.6% (1,044) | 0.5% (169) |
High School Diploma | 16.8% (6,623) | 22.0% (6,922) |
Less than High School | 21.4% (8,451) | 12.7% (4,002) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.8% (6,219) | 18.0% (5,667) |
Education Levels Comparison: Duncanville vs Washington
- A higher percentage of residents in Duncanville have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.5% in Washington.
- In Washington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.0% compared to 16.8% in Duncanville.
- More residents in Duncanville have less than a high school education at 21.4% compared to 12.7% in Washington.
- In Washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.0% compared to 15.8% in Duncanville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.