Demographics details for Duncanville, TX vs Earlham, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Duncanville, TX vs Earlham, IA.
| Data | Duncanville | Earlham |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,413 | 1,423 |
| Median Age | 36.9 years | 41.1 years |
| Median Income | $66,601 | $103,977 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Duncanville vs Earlham
- In Duncanville, the population is higher at 39,413, compared to 1,423 in Earlham.
- The median age in Earlham is higher at 41.1 years, compared to 36.9 years in Duncanville.
- Earlham has a higher median income of $103,977, compared to $66,601 in Duncanville.
- In Earlham, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 36.0% in Duncanville.
- Duncanville has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 5% in Earlham.
- The unemployment rate in Duncanville is higher at 4.7%, compared to 3.2% in Earlham.
Demographics
Demographics Duncanville vs Earlham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Duncanville | Earlham |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 33 | 2 |
| White | 10 | 95 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 43 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Duncanville vs Earlham
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Duncanville at 33% compared to 2% in Earlham.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Earlham at 95% compared to 10% in Duncanville.
- The Asian population is larger in Duncanville at 2% compared to 0% in Earlham.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Duncanville at 43% compared to 1% in Earlham.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Duncanville at 11% compared to 2% in Earlham.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Duncanville at 1% compared to 0% in Earlham.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Duncanville | Earlham |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 8.5% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 18.4% |
| Smoking | 16.9% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 23.0% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Duncanville vs Earlham
- More residents in Duncanville report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 14.4% in Earlham.
- Depression is more prevalent in Duncanville at 22.0% compared to 18.4% in Earlham.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Duncanville at 16.9% compared to 14.6% in Earlham.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Earlham at 23.0% compared to 17.6% in Duncanville.
- Earlham has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 36.6% in Duncanville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Duncanville at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Earlham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Duncanville | Earlham |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.6% (1,044) | 0.7% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 16.8% (6,623) | 13.8% (197) |
| Less than High School | 21.4% (8,451) | 6.0% (85) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.8% (6,219) | 17.0% (242) |
Education Levels Comparison: Duncanville vs Earlham
- A higher percentage of residents in Duncanville have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.7% in Earlham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Duncanville hold a high school diploma at 16.8% compared to 13.8% in Earlham.
- More residents in Duncanville have less than a high school education at 21.4% compared to 6.0% in Earlham.
- In Earlham, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 15.8% in Duncanville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.