Demographics details for Duncanville, TX vs Clayton, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Duncanville, TX vs Clayton, OH.
| Data | Duncanville | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,413 | 13,235 |
| Median Age | 36.9 years | 46.0 years |
| Median Income | $66,601 | $89,282 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Duncanville vs Clayton
- In Duncanville, the population is higher at 39,413, compared to 13,235 in Clayton.
- The median age in Clayton is higher at 46.0 years, compared to 36.9 years in Duncanville.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $89,282, compared to $66,601 in Duncanville.
- In Clayton, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 36.0% in Duncanville.
- Duncanville has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Clayton.
- The unemployment rate in Duncanville is higher at 4.7%, compared to 3.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Duncanville vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Duncanville | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 33 | 30 |
| White | 10 | 61 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 43 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Duncanville vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Duncanville at 33% compared to 30% in Clayton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clayton at 61% compared to 10% in Duncanville.
- Both Duncanville and Clayton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Duncanville at 43% compared to 2% in Clayton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Duncanville at 11% compared to 5% in Clayton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Duncanville at 1% compared to 0% in Clayton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Duncanville | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 16.9% | 15.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Duncanville vs Clayton
- More residents in Duncanville report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 16.8% in Clayton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clayton at 24.4% versus 22.0% in Duncanville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Duncanville at 16.9% compared to 15.3% in Clayton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clayton at 18.9% compared to 17.6% in Duncanville.
- Clayton has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 36.6% in Duncanville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clayton at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Duncanville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Duncanville | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.6% (1,044) | 0.2% (30) |
| High School Diploma | 16.8% (6,623) | 17.9% (2,371) |
| Less than High School | 21.4% (8,451) | 5.6% (746) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.8% (6,219) | 26.3% (3,484) |
Education Levels Comparison: Duncanville vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of residents in Duncanville have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.2% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.9% compared to 16.8% in Duncanville.
- More residents in Duncanville have less than a high school education at 21.4% compared to 5.6% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 15.8% in Duncanville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.