Demographics details for Dryden, VA vs Gill, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dryden, VA vs Gill, CO.
| Data | Dryden | Gill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 684 | 102 |
| Median Age | 38.2 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $52,054 | $60,000 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Dryden vs Gill
- In Dryden, the population is higher at 684, compared to 102 in Gill.
- Residents in Dryden have a higher median age of 38.2 years compared to 37.0 years in Gill.
- Gill has a higher median income of $60,000, compared to $52,054 in Dryden.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Dryden and Gill at 30.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Gill at 12%, compared to 10% in Dryden.
- The unemployment rate in Dryden is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.0% in Gill.
Demographics
Demographics Dryden vs Gill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dryden | Gill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 99 | 100 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Dryden vs Gill
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Dryden and Gill at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gill at 100% compared to 99% in Dryden.
- Both Dryden and Gill have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Dryden at 1% compared to 0% in Gill.
- Both Dryden and Gill have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 0%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dryden and Gill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dryden | Gill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.1% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 27.8% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 23.5% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 40.6% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dryden vs Gill
- More residents in Dryden report poor mental health at 20.1% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dryden at 27.8% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Dryden at 23.5% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Dryden at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
- Obesity rates are higher in Dryden at 40.6% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Dryden at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dryden | Gill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.5% (24) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.2% (97) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 13.5% (92) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.5% (79) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dryden vs Gill
- A higher percentage of residents in Dryden have no formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dryden hold a high school diploma at 14.2% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
- More residents in Dryden have less than a high school education at 13.5% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dryden hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.5% compared to 0.0% in Gill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.