Demographics details for Dryden, VA vs Fairfield, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dryden, VA vs Fairfield, AL.
Data | Dryden | Fairfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 684 | 9,690 |
Median Age | 38.2 years | 30.7 years |
Median Income | $52,054 | $45,646 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 20.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 30% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Dryden vs Fairfield
- The population in Fairfield is higher at 9,690, compared to 684 in Dryden.
- Residents in Dryden have a higher median age of 38.2 years compared to 30.7 years in Fairfield.
- Dryden has a higher median income of $52,054 compared to $45,646 in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Dryden at 30.0% compared to 20.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairfield at 30%, compared to 10% in Dryden.
- Fairfield has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.5% in Dryden.
Demographics
Demographics Dryden vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Dryden | Fairfield |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 95 |
White | 99 | 3 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Dryden vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 95% compared to 0% in Dryden.
- Dryden has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 3% in Fairfield.
- Both Dryden and Fairfield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Dryden at 1% compared to 0% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fairfield at 2%, compared to 0% in Dryden.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dryden and Fairfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Dryden | Fairfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.1% | 19.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 14.2% |
Depression | 27.8% | 19.6% |
Smoking | 23.5% | 20.6% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 11.7% |
Obesity | 40.6% | 48.1% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dryden vs Fairfield
- More residents in Dryden report poor mental health at 20.1% compared to 19.7% in Fairfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Dryden at 27.8% compared to 19.6% in Fairfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Dryden at 23.5% compared to 20.6% in Fairfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Dryden at 16.9% compared to 11.7% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has higher obesity rates at 48.1% compared to 40.6% in Dryden.
- Disability percentages are higher in Dryden at 21.0% compared to 14.0% in Fairfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Dryden | Fairfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.5% (24) | 0.5% (53) |
High School Diploma | 14.2% (97) | 22.3% (2,159) |
Less than High School | 13.5% (92) | 3.1% (302) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.5% (79) | 14.8% (1,437) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dryden vs Fairfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Dryden have no formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 0.5% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.3% compared to 14.2% in Dryden.
- More residents in Dryden have less than a high school education at 13.5% compared to 3.1% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 11.5% in Dryden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.