Demographics details for Draper, UT vs Watkins, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Draper, UT vs Watkins, CO.
Data | Draper | Watkins |
---|---|---|
Population | 50,731 | 991 |
Median Age | 33.6 years | 46.7 years |
Median Income | $126,041 | $153,000 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 71.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Draper vs Watkins
- In Draper, the population is higher at 50,731, compared to 991 in Watkins.
- The median age in Watkins is higher at 46.7 years, compared to 33.6 years in Draper.
- Watkins has a higher median income of $153,000, compared to $126,041 in Draper.
- In Watkins, the percentage of married families is higher at 71.0%, compared to 45.0% in Draper.
- The poverty level is identical in both Draper and Watkins at 0%.
- The unemployment rate in Draper is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.2% in Watkins.
Demographics
Demographics Draper vs Watkins provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Draper | Watkins |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | Data is updating |
White | 81 | 36 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 7 | 30 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 33 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Draper vs Watkins
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Draper at 2% compared to 0% in Watkins.
- Draper has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 36% in Watkins.
- The Asian population is larger in Draper at 4% compared to 0% in Watkins.
- Watkins has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 7% in Draper.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Watkins at 33%, compared to 6% in Draper.
- In Watkins, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Draper.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Draper | Watkins |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 15.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 9.6% |
Depression | 25.3% | 21.9% |
Smoking | 7.1% | 14.9% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 20.3% |
Obesity | 28.2% | 25.4% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Draper vs Watkins
- More residents in Draper report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 15.2% in Watkins.
- Depression is more prevalent in Draper at 25.3% compared to 21.9% in Watkins.
- Watkins has a higher smoking rate at 14.9% compared to 7.1% in Draper.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Watkins at 20.3% compared to 16.7% in Draper.
- Obesity rates are higher in Draper at 28.2% compared to 25.4% in Watkins.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Watkins at 9.0% compared to 6.0% in Draper.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Draper | Watkins |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (347) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 7.4% (3,771) | 25.0% (248) |
Less than High School | 4.1% (2,077) | 20.0% (198) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.1% (15,258) | 22.6% (224) |
Education Levels Comparison: Draper vs Watkins
- A higher percentage of residents in Draper have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Watkins.
- In Watkins, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.0% compared to 7.4% in Draper.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Watkins at 20.0%, compared to 4.1% in Draper.
- A higher percentage of residents in Draper hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 22.6% in Watkins.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.