Demographics details for Draper, UT vs Spotsylvania, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Draper, UT vs Spotsylvania, VA.
| Data | Draper | Spotsylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 50,731 | 146,688 |
| Median Age | 33.6 years | 38.1 years |
| Median Income | $126,041 | $105,068 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Draper vs Spotsylvania
- The population in Spotsylvania is higher at 146,688, compared to 50,731 in Draper.
- The median age in Spotsylvania is higher at 38.1 years, compared to 33.6 years in Draper.
- Draper has a higher median income of $126,041 compared to $105,068 in Spotsylvania.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Draper at 45.0% compared to 43.0% in Spotsylvania.
- The poverty level is higher in Spotsylvania at 5%, compared to 0% in Draper.
- The unemployment rate in Draper is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.2% in Spotsylvania.
Demographics
Demographics Draper vs Spotsylvania provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Draper | Spotsylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 16 |
| White | 81 | 63 |
| Asian | 4 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Draper vs Spotsylvania
- In Spotsylvania, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 2% in Draper.
- Draper has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 63% in Spotsylvania.
- The Asian population is larger in Draper at 4% compared to 3% in Spotsylvania.
- Spotsylvania has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 7% in Draper.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Spotsylvania at 7%, compared to 6% in Draper.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Draper and Spotsylvania at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Draper | Spotsylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 7.1% | 13.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 28.2% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Draper vs Spotsylvania
- More residents in Draper report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 15.5% in Spotsylvania.
- Depression is more prevalent in Draper at 25.3% compared to 21.8% in Spotsylvania.
- Spotsylvania has a higher smoking rate at 13.7% compared to 7.1% in Draper.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Spotsylvania at 17.1% compared to 16.7% in Draper.
- Spotsylvania has higher obesity rates at 35.9% compared to 28.2% in Draper.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Spotsylvania at 10.0% compared to 6.0% in Draper.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Draper | Spotsylvania |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (347) | 0.9% (1,297) |
| High School Diploma | 7.4% (3,771) | 15.5% (22,702) |
| Less than High School | 4.1% (2,077) | 10.2% (14,913) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.1% (15,258) | 21.4% (31,461) |
Education Levels Comparison: Draper vs Spotsylvania
- In Spotsylvania, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Draper.
- In Spotsylvania, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.5% compared to 7.4% in Draper.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Spotsylvania at 10.2%, compared to 4.1% in Draper.
- A higher percentage of residents in Draper hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 21.4% in Spotsylvania.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.