Demographics details for Draper, UT vs Mikado, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Draper, UT vs Mikado, MI.
| Data | Draper | Mikado |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 50,731 | 820 |
| Median Age | 33.6 years | 47.7 years |
| Median Income | $126,041 | $46,250 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Draper vs Mikado
- In Draper, the population is higher at 50,731, compared to 820 in Mikado.
- The median age in Mikado is higher at 47.7 years, compared to 33.6 years in Draper.
- Draper has a higher median income of $126,041 compared to $46,250 in Mikado.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Draper at 45.0% compared to 42.0% in Mikado.
- The poverty level is identical in both Draper and Mikado at 0%.
- Mikado has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Draper.
Demographics
Demographics Draper vs Mikado provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Draper | Mikado |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 3 |
| White | 81 | 92 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Draper vs Mikado
- In Mikado, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Draper.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mikado at 92% compared to 81% in Draper.
- The Asian population is larger in Draper at 4% compared to 0% in Mikado.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Draper at 7% compared to 0% in Mikado.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Draper at 6% compared to 3% in Mikado.
- In Mikado, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Draper.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Draper | Mikado |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 25.3% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 7.1% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 28.2% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Draper vs Mikado
- More residents in Draper report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Mikado.
- Depression is more prevalent in Draper at 25.3% compared to 0.0% in Mikado.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Draper at 7.1% compared to 0.0% in Mikado.
- Binge drinking is more common in Draper at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Mikado.
- Obesity rates are higher in Draper at 28.2% compared to 0.0% in Mikado.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mikado at 24.0% compared to 6.0% in Draper.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Draper | Mikado |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (347) | 0.7% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 7.4% (3,771) | 24.5% (201) |
| Less than High School | 4.1% (2,077) | 12.7% (104) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.1% (15,258) | 6.1% (50) |
Education Levels Comparison: Draper vs Mikado
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Draper and Mikado at 0.7%.
- In Mikado, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 7.4% in Draper.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mikado at 12.7%, compared to 4.1% in Draper.
- A higher percentage of residents in Draper hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 6.1% in Mikado.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.