Demographics details for Draper, UT vs Livermore, ME
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Draper, UT vs Livermore, ME.
| Data | Draper | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 50,731 | 2,120 |
| Median Age | 33.6 years | 45.0 years |
| Median Income | $126,041 | $55,000 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Draper vs Livermore
- In Draper, the population is higher at 50,731, compared to 2,120 in Livermore.
- The median age in Livermore is higher at 45.0 years, compared to 33.6 years in Draper.
- Draper has a higher median income of $126,041 compared to $55,000 in Livermore.
- In Livermore, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 45.0% in Draper.
- The poverty level is higher in Livermore at 12%, compared to 0% in Draper.
- The unemployment rate in Draper is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.3% in Livermore.
Demographics
Demographics Draper vs Livermore provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Draper | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 81 | 97 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Draper vs Livermore
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Draper at 2% compared to 1% in Livermore.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Livermore at 97% compared to 81% in Draper.
- The Asian population is larger in Draper at 4% compared to 1% in Livermore.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Draper at 7% compared to 1% in Livermore.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Draper at 6% compared to 0% in Livermore.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Draper and Livermore at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Draper | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 25.3% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 7.1% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 28.2% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Draper vs Livermore
- More residents in Draper report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
- Depression is more prevalent in Draper at 25.3% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Draper at 7.1% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
- Binge drinking is more common in Draper at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
- Obesity rates are higher in Draper at 28.2% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
- Disability percentages are higher in Draper at 6.0% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Draper | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (347) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 7.4% (3,771) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 4.1% (2,077) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.1% (15,258) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Draper vs Livermore
- A higher percentage of residents in Draper have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
- A higher percentage of residents in Draper hold a high school diploma at 7.4% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
- More residents in Draper have less than a high school education at 4.1% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
- A higher percentage of residents in Draper hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.